These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. OPRR issues final findings in its investigation of university. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights. Katerberg RJ J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask? Koski G IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New guidance on when and how to report human research problems. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 16270442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters. Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New compliance requirement when subjects are children. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):9. PubMed ID: 11789520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. University later admits that regulations were not followed. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. University denies that it failed to comply with special rule for subjects who are prisoners. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16270439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ... (Part I). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Nov; 14(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 12194197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Office of Human Research Protections. Chamberlain B Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Subject's parents claim university was not responsive to their requests. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Sep; 15(9):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A taxonomy of value in clinical research. Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court said IRB had too much power to make consent decisions for minors. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Resuscitation research and consent: ethical and practical issues. Bircher NG Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S379-84. PubMed ID: 12771587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]