These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells. Holden C Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Senators grill NIH director over restrictions on stem-cell research. Brainard J Chron High Educ; 2003 Jun; 49(39):A25. PubMed ID: 15287128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. University stem cells for sale. Birmingham K Nat Med; 2000 Mar; 6(3):237. PubMed ID: 10700203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reflections on the United States National Institutes of Health draft guidelines for research involving human pluripotent stem cells--theological perspective. Sotis JJ Med Etika Bioet; 2000; 7(1-2):19-21. PubMed ID: 11933979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Commodification and commercialization in human embryo research. Alpers A; Lo B Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 12645598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation. Miller JF Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos. George EP Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Taking another look at the definition of an embryo: President Bush's criteria and the problematic application of federal regulations to human embryonic stem cells. Auerbach SB Emory Law J; 2002; 51(4):1557-604. PubMed ID: 15212030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight. Fowler HL Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Betwixt and between human stem cell guidelines and legislation. Baylis F Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15739317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. IRBs and human embryonic stem cell experimentation. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 16270438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules. Casey SB; Adams NA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections. Momeyer RW Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ways to treat disease that do not devalue life. Bevilacqua A Origins; 2000 Sep; 30(13):195. PubMed ID: 11873807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomedical research. A first step in relaxing restrictions on stem cell research. Holden C Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5920):1412-3. PubMed ID: 19286523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Regulation of research with children: the evolution from exclusion to inclusion. Alexander D J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15017949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A scientific rationale for human embryonic stem cell research. Kaufman DS Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 177-87. PubMed ID: 12664943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Without more federal support, success of U.S. stem cell research questioned. Schmidt C J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 15687355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]