392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933970)
1. The use of stem cells in biomedical research. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) position statement.
Biotechnology Industry Organization
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 3(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11933970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act: what to expect from stem cell research?
Panetta J; Wetherell J; Mehok M
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 16619447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem cell research and the role of the new President's Council on Bioethics.
Cohen CB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 12085946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Taking the profit out of biomedical research tools.
Flores MA
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):819-20. PubMed ID: 10429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Industry and academia in transition.
Kennedy D
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5649):1293. PubMed ID: 14631000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem-cell lines.
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Foresight, insight, oversight.
White GB
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 10321343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomedical policy. Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells.
Vogel G
Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1242-5. PubMed ID: 11509703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ruling may free NIH to fund stem cells studies.
Marshall E
Science; 1999 Jan; 283(5401):465, 467. PubMed ID: 9988645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Public-private partnerships in biomedical research: resolving conflicts arising under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986.
Bulleit TN
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11652568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis.
Gross GS
Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Breakthrough stirs US embryo debate..
Butler D
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6707):104. PubMed ID: 9823879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Private ethics boards and public debate.
Tauer CA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 10321344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Taking another look at the definition of an embryo: President Bush's criteria and the problematic application of federal regulations to human embryonic stem cells.
Auerbach SB
Emory Law J; 2002; 51(4):1557-604. PubMed ID: 15212030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US stem cell policy comes under fire.
Fletcher L
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):893-4. PubMed ID: 11581638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research on embryonic tissue, ethics, and congressional inquiry.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 11657559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Battle lines shift in stem-cell funding fight...as non-profit companies enter the fray.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6782):6. PubMed ID: 10811186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
