392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933970)
21. Stem cells. HHS inks cell deal; NAS calls for more lines.
Holden C
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1966-7. PubMed ID: 11557847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The politics of bioethics.
Cohen E; Kristol W
Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Destructive stem-cell research on human embryos.
Doerflinger R
Origins; 1999 Apr; 28(45):769, 771-773. PubMed ID: 11660699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Bush policy on human stem cells faces new challenges.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():A18. PubMed ID: 15022669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Razing the tollbooths. A call for restricting patents on basic biomedical research.
Stix G
Sci Am; 2003 Apr; 288(4):37. PubMed ID: 12661312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stem cell hearing stirs bioethics debate.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jan; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 9920250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos.
George EP
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Institutional review boards have new role in stem cell research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11913434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Destroying human embryos for research.
National Catholic Bioethics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Ethics Medics; 2000 Mar; 25(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12201302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Senators grill NIH director over restrictions on stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Jun; 49(39):A25. PubMed ID: 15287128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Protesters seek US ban on embryo stem-cell work...as Wisconsin researcher awaits go-ahead.
Wadman M
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):96. PubMed ID: 10408425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. NIH is flooded with comments on plan to finance stem-cell studies.
Southwick R
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):A36. PubMed ID: 11657698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Funding of human embryo research in the US.
Thomson J
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):312. PubMed ID: 10207858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Primordial cells fuel debate on ethics.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Nov; ():F1, F2. PubMed ID: 11648098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The stem cell debate.
Dasgupta S
Genewatch; 1999 Apr; 12(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12199296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Stem cell research in Canada: business opportunities for U.S. companies.
Reicin C; McMahon E
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 16538805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stem-cell giveaway proposed as confusion reigns over cell count.
Knight J
Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6849):753-4. PubMed ID: 11518925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
