These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11934004)

  • 21. Inhibition of return: sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):908-19. PubMed ID: 16846287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.
    Chica AB; Christie J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The serial process in visual search.
    Gilden DL; Thornton TL; Marusich LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 20515187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional awakening: gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Ariga A; Yokosawa K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 17106706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Similarity determines the attentional blink.
    Raymond JE; Shapiro KL; Arnell KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):653-62. PubMed ID: 7790839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of temporal order is impaired during the time course of the attentional blink.
    Spalek TM; Lagroix HE; Yanko MR; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):402-13. PubMed ID: 21928925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.
    Kwak HW; Egeth H
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 1594435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.
    Ward R; Duncan J; Shapiro K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 9158333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: encoding failure or retrieval failure?
    Armstrong IT; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Oct; 21(5):1044-52. PubMed ID: 7595242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal production and visuospatial processing.
    Benuzzi F; Basso G; Nichelli P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):737-58. PubMed ID: 16491677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inhibition-of-return at multiple locations in visual space.
    Wright RD; Richard CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Sep; 50(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 9004928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RSVP in orbit: identification of single and dual targets in motion.
    Wyble B; Potter MC; Mattar M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):553-62. PubMed ID: 22207310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance differences as a function of stimulus-response compatibility with rapid serial visual presentation and spatially distributed presentation styles.
    Utesch BS; Lang VA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):643-7. PubMed ID: 8724941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How serial is serial processing in vision?
    Zohary E; Hochstein S
    Perception; 1989; 18(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 2771604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cuing the dimension of a distractor: verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons.
    Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 16724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.