BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11934191)

  • 1. Computer-assisted analysis of oral brush biopsies at an oral cancer screening program.
    Christian DC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Mar; 133(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 11934191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group.
    Sciubba JJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1445-57. PubMed ID: 10570588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [OralCDx brush biopsy--a tool for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma].
    Kosicki DM; Riva C; Pajarola GF; Burkhardt A; Grätz KW
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2007; 117(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 17425240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study: one in 10 dental professionals had oral lesions that required additional testing.
    Dent Today; 2002 May; 21(5):40. PubMed ID: 12026714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for oral cancer and precancer--a valuable new technique.
    Drinnan AJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 12004660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy.
    Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Page DG; Abbey LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):99-102, 104, 106; quiz 108. PubMed ID: 11911069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental hygienists and dentists as providers of brush biopsies for oral mucosa screening.
    Edman K; Stark CR; Basic V; Lindblad J; Hirsch JM
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2023 Aug; 21(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 37401636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The oral brush biopsy: a new reason to screen every patient for oral cancer.
    Eisen D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 11199564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.
    Mehrotra R; Mishra S; Singh M; Singh M
    Head Neck Oncol; 2011 Aug; 3():39. PubMed ID: 21864339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.
    Bhoopathi V; Kabani S; Mascarenhas AK
    Cancer; 2009 Mar; 115(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19165806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.
    Mehrotra R; Singh MK; Pandya S; Singh M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18644521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjunctive screening devices for oral lesions: their use by Canadian Dental Hygienists and the need for knowledge translation.
    Laronde DM; Corbett KK
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Aug; 15(3):187-194. PubMed ID: 26694690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of two computer-assisted screening methods for diagnosing oral precancer and cancer.
    Ye X; Zhang J; Tan Y; Chen G; Zhou G
    Oral Oncol; 2015 Nov; 51(11):966-975. PubMed ID: 26384539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.
    Svirsky JA; Burns JC; Carpenter WM; Cohen DM; Bhattacharyya I; Fantasia JE; Lederman DA; Lynch DP; Sciubba JJ; Zunt SL
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 12572180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiopsy a novel sampling technique to early detect dysplastic/malignant alterations in oral mucosal lesions: practicability by general dentists.
    Pentenero M; Marino R; Tempia Valenta G; Navone R; Gandolfo S
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2014 Jul; 43(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 24484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of oral brush biopsy.
    Hohlweg-Majert B; Deppe H; Metzger MC; Schumm S; Hoefler H; Kesting MR; Hölzle F; Wolff KD
    Cancer Invest; 2009 Mar; 27(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 19160103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of toluidine blue staining and brush biopsy in precancerous and cancerous oral lesions.
    Gupta A; Singh M; Ibrahim R; Mehrotra R
    Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 17910350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of health care workers' accuracy in recognising oral cancer and pre-cancer.
    Jullien JA; Downer MC; Speight PM; Zakrzewska JM
    Int Dent J; 1996 Aug; 46(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 9147121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a suspicious oral mucosal lesion.
    Williams PM; Poh CF; Hovan AJ; Ng S; Rosin MP
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 74(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 18387268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements.
    Pektas ZO; Keskin A; Günhan O; Karslioğlu Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):628-35. PubMed ID: 16546642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.