These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11934226)

  • 1. Determination of in vivo bioequivalence.
    Jackson AJ
    Pharm Res; 2002 Mar; 19(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 11934226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioequivalence assessment: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.
    Godbillon J; Cardot JM; Lecaillon JB; Lefevre G; Sioufi A
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 1996; 21(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8839689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.
    Kreilgaard M; Kemme MJ; Burggraaf J; Schoemaker RC; Cohen AF
    Pharm Res; 2001 May; 18(5):593-9. PubMed ID: 11465413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical aspects of bioequivalence testing between two medicinal products.
    Zintzaras E
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2005; 30(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 16010860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioequivalence. An updated reappraisal addressed to applications of interchangeable multi-source pharmaceutical products.
    Marzo A; Balant LP
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1995 Feb; 45(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7710428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current challenges facing the determination of product bioequivalence in veterinary medicine.
    Martinez MN; Hunter RP
    J Vet Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Oct; 33(5):418-33. PubMed ID: 20840385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.
    Midha KK; Rawson MJ; Hubbard JW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Oct; 43(10):485-98. PubMed ID: 16240706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biometrical evaluation of bioequivalence trials using a bootstrap individual direct curve comparison method.
    Zintzaras E; Bouka P; Kowald A
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2002; 27(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11996322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing individual bioequivalence using the structural equation model.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):901-12. PubMed ID: 12627408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An adjusted two one-sided t-test for the assessment of bioequivalence with multiple doses.
    Wang W; Hsuan F; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):157-70. PubMed ID: 9056595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing bioequivalence for inhaled drugs; weighing the evidence.
    Daley-Yates PT; Parkins DA
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1297-308. PubMed ID: 21699442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified Regulatory Pathways to Approve Generic Drugs in the US and a Systematic Review of Their Outcomes.
    Kesselheim AS; Polinski JM; Fulchino LA; Isaman DL; Gagne JJ
    Drugs; 2015 Apr; 75(6):633-50. PubMed ID: 25822610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulatory framework on bioequivalence criteria for locally acting gastrointestinal drugs: the case for oral modified release mesalamine formulations.
    Sferrazza G; Siviero PD; Nicotera G; Turella P; Serafino A; Blandizzi C; Pierimarchi P
    Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Sep; 10(9):1007-1019. PubMed ID: 28656793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioequivalence assessment of generic drugs: an American point of view.
    Patnaik R; Lesko LJ; Chan K; Williams RL
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 1996; 21(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 8839690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bio-International 92, conference on bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies.
    Blume HH; Midha KK
    J Pharm Sci; 1993 Nov; 82(11):1186-9. PubMed ID: 7904641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The transitivity of bioequivalence testing: potential for drift.
    Anderson S; Hauck WW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Sep; 34(9):369-74. PubMed ID: 8880284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A group sequential approach to crossover trials for average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Preston PE; Bois FY
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 9056590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioequivalence.
    Rescigno A
    Pharm Res; 1992 Jul; 9(7):925-8. PubMed ID: 1438007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New bioequivalence studies: individual bioequivalence and population bioequivalence.
    Nakai K; Fujita M; Ogata H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2000 Nov; 120(11):1201-8. PubMed ID: 11190205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of direct curve comparison metrics applied to pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability and bioequivalence.
    Marston SA; Polli JE
    Pharm Res; 1997 Oct; 14(10):1363-9. PubMed ID: 9358548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.