368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11934941)
1. Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.
Hinkka H; Kosunen E; Metsänoja R; Lammi UK; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P
J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11934941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision making in terminal care: a survey of finnish doctors' treatment decisions in end-of-life scenarios involving a terminal cancer and a terminal dementia patient.
Hinkka H; Kosunen E; Lammi EK; Metsänoja R; Puustelli A; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P
Palliat Med; 2002 May; 16(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 12046995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical decisions concerning the end of life: a discussion with Japanese physicians.
Asai A; Fukuhara S; Inoshita O; Miura Y; Tanabe N; Kurokawa K
J Med Ethics; 1997 Oct; 23(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9358355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does special education in palliative medicine make a difference in end-of-life decision-making?
Piili RP; Lehto JT; Luukkaala T; Hinkka H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PI
BMC Palliat Care; 2018 Jul; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.
Farber NJ; Simpson P; Salam T; Collier VU; Weiner J; Boyer EG
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16534044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. To resuscitate or not: a dilemma in terminal cancer care.
Hinkka H; Kosunen E; Metsänoja R; Lammi UK; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P
Resuscitation; 2001 Jun; 49(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 11719124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of Japanese physicians' attitudes towards the care of adult patients in persistent vegetative state.
Asai A; Maekawa M; Akiguchi I; Fukui T; Miura Y; Tanabe N; Fukuhara S
J Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; 25(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 10461592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. US Physicians' Opinions about Distinctions between Withdrawing and Withholding Life-Sustaining Treatment.
Chung GS; Yoon JD; Rasinski KA; Curlin FA
J Relig Health; 2016 Oct; 55(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 26725047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.
Richter J; Eisemann M; Zgonnikova E
J Med Ethics; 2001 Jun; 27(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 11417027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?
White BP; Willmott L; Cartwright C; Parker M; Williams G; Davis J
BMC Palliat Care; 2017 Nov; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 29179708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment decision-making at the end of life: a survey of Australian doctors' attitudes towards patients' wishes and euthanasia.
Waddell C; Clarnette RM; Smith M; Oldham L; Kellehear A
Med J Aust; 1996 Nov; 165(10):540-4. PubMed ID: 8941238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment.
Hanson LC; Danis M; Garrett JM; Mutran E
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Apr; 156(7):785-9. PubMed ID: 8615712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Asia.
Phua J; Joynt GM; Nishimura M; Deng Y; Myatra SN; Chan YH; Binh NG; Tan CC; Faruq MO; Arabi YM; Wahjuprajitno B; Liu SF; Hashemian SM; Kashif W; Staworn D; Palo JE; Koh Y;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Mar; 175(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 25581712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physicians' attitudes and experiences about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in pediatrics: a systematic review of quantitative evidence.
Zhong Y; Cavolo A; Labarque V; Gastmans C
BMC Palliat Care; 2023 Sep; 22(1):145. PubMed ID: 37773128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physicians' decreased tendency to choose palliative care for patients with advanced dementia between 1999 and 2015.
Haapasalmi S; Piili RP; Metsänoja R; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PI; Lehto JT
BMC Palliat Care; 2021 Jul; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 34311739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-sustaining treatment decisions by spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Mezey M; Kluger M; Maislin G; Mittelman M
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1996 Feb; 44(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8576503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nationwide study of decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment in Dutch medical practice.
Groenewoud JH; van der Heide A; Kester JG; de Graaff CL; van der Wal G; van der Maas PJ
Arch Intern Med; 2000 Feb; 160(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 10668838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. End-of-life decisions in intensive care units: attitudes of physicians in an Italian urban setting.
Giannini A; Pessina A; Tacchi EM
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Nov; 29(11):1902-10. PubMed ID: 13680120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Hamel MB; Teno JM; Goldman L; Lynn J; Davis RB; Galanos AN; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 10068357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.
Christakis NA; Asch DA
Am J Public Health; 1995 Mar; 85(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 7892921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]