150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11935569)
1. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers.
Vierling L
Case Manager; 2000; 11(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11935569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers. Part IV.
Vierling L
Case Manager; 2000; 11(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 11935612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers. Part II.
Vierling L
Case Manager; 2000; 11(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 11935528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers. Part III.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2000; 11(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 11935643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Congress restores the Americans With Disabilities Act to its original intent.
Petrila J
Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jul; 60(7):878-9. PubMed ID: 19564215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Regarded as" disabled.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2005; 16(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 16061156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme court agrees to define employer.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2003; 14(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 12532074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court establishes new legal standard.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2002; 13(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 12011831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Americans with Disabilities Act update.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2001; 12(3):77-82. PubMed ID: 11351240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. California's expanded protection.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2006; 17(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 16867880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. High court asked to review differing definitions of 'disability'.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Feb; 12(3):3. PubMed ID: 11364115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More on reasonable accommodation.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2005; 16(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 15999083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court explores nexus between ADA, social security.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Mar; 14(5):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11366439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proving disability remains difficult.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2004; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14961012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ADA in the courts.
Shepard G
GMHC Treat Issues; 1999; 13(5-6):11-3. PubMed ID: 11367135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court renders final ADA decisions for this term.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2002; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 12239508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Flawed language or judges rule.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2006; 17(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 16473249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. High court won't review AIDS medical cap on ex-employee.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Jun; 12(11):11. PubMed ID: 11364385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Worker with asymptomatic HIV is not disabled under ADA, court says.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Dec; 11(22):1, 11. PubMed ID: 11364059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme court reviews drug addiction case.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2004; 15(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 15026764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
