149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11935569)
21. Americans with disabilities act: recent and pending u.s. Supreme court decisions and implications for spine professionals.
Blanck P; Schmeling JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Feb; 27(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 11840113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Americans with Disabilities Act, 16 years later.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2006; 17(6):24-8. PubMed ID: 17116536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. HIV infection isn't necessarily an impairment under the ADA. Americans with Disabilities Act.
AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Jun; 10(10):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 11362514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. US: Supreme Court adopts narrow definition of "disability" under anti-discrimination law.
Elliott R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 14979273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.
Parmet WE
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. ADA: Supreme Court disallows disparate impact analysis of facially valid employment procedures.
Walter S
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):373-5. PubMed ID: 15301205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. 2003 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update.
Allbright AL
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2004; 28(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 15384870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court reinforces "reasonable medical judgment" case law.
Vierling LE
Case Manager; 2003; 14(6):24-7. PubMed ID: 14618145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. U.S. Supreme Court refuses appeal on union seniority issue.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Apr; 12(7):3. PubMed ID: 11364233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 'Good-faith efforts' are enough to avoid punitive damages.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Jul; 14(13):12. PubMed ID: 11366588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Supreme Court leaves intact ruling permitting AIDS caps.
AIDS Policy Law; 2000 Jan; 15(1):1,6. PubMed ID: 11367211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Supreme Court decisions impact ADA.
D'Arruda K
AAOHN J; 2000 Jul; 48(7):322-4. PubMed ID: 11261179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Supreme Court to hear trio of ADA employment cases.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Feb; 14(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11366268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Supreme Court refuses appeal in insurance case.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 11365097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Learning disabilities, employment discrimination, and the ADA.
Anderson PL; Kazmierski S; Cronin ME
J Learn Disabil; 1995 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 7738432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of treatment can be a disability, court says.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Oct; 12(18):7. PubMed ID: 11364731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Court lets plaintiffs pursue job bias claims while on disability.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Jul; 12(13):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 11364504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Required reading. Federal Disabilities Act increases litigation risks for providers.
O'Hare PK; Schmidt WT
Health Prog; 1991 Apr; 72(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 10170704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High court considers whether ADA claims must be arbitrated.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Oct; 13(20):6. PubMed ID: 11366013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
