These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11935856)

  • 1. Several women students were diagnosed with chlamydial infections last term so we are keen to promote awareness of this condition.
    Kilcoin A
    Nurs Times; 2001 Sep 20-26; 97(38):39. PubMed ID: 11935856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chlamydia testing in contraceptive clinics: who, where, how and why?
    Bacon L
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2004 Apr; 30(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 15086988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removing the stigma.
    Kilcoin A
    Nurs Times; 2001 Nov 15-21; 97(46):60-1. PubMed ID: 11966059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in unnecessary Chlamydia screening among older women at title X-funded family planning sites following a structural intervention--San Francisco, 2009.
    Bernstein KT; Marcus JL; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21139515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A paradox: overscreening of older women for Chlamydia while too few younger women are being tested.
    Berman SM; Satterwhite CL
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 21173722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamydial infections among family planning clinic patients in Georgia: who should be screened?
    Williamson DM; Mertz KJ; Toomey KE
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1998 Apr; 87(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 16259265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chlamydia--the problem that just won't go away.
    Coughlan E; Bagshaw S
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1220):U1605. PubMed ID: 16132067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
    McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pelvic examination leads to changed clinical management in very few women diagnosed with asymptomatic chlamydia infection.
    Lee YM; Samaranayake A; Fairley CK; Chen MY; MacFarlane F; Bradshaw CS; Hocking JS
    Sex Health; 2010 Dec; 7(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 21062594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HEDIS 2000 measures zero in on women's health issues.
    Healthc Demand Dis Manag; 1999 Jul; 5(7):101-4. PubMed ID: 10621119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chlamydia screening in teenage girls.
    Burns N; Briggs P; Gaudet CA
    Nurse Pract; 2007 Jun; 32(6):41-3. PubMed ID: 17557026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food for thought in women's health. The gynecologist: the new European gatekeeper in Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Polyzos NP; Vittoraki A; Tsappi M; Mauri D; Spiliopoulou A; Tzioras S; Kamposioras K; Ioakeimidou A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1156-9. PubMed ID: 17068672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is jail screening associated with a decrease in Chlamydia positivity among females seeking health services at community clinics?-San francisco, 1997-2004.
    Barry PM; Kent CK; Scott KC; Goldenson J; Klausner JD
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S22-8. PubMed ID: 18418298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Translating and sustaining a chlamydial screening intervention 4 years later.
    Tebb K; Wibbelsman C; Ko T; Neuhaus JM; Shafer MA
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 171(19):1767-8. PubMed ID: 22025436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. University undergraduates' knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Greaves A; Lonsdale S; Whinney S; Hood E; Mossop H; Olowokure B
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Feb; 14(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19241303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses can promote breast health.
    Gladfelter J
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2007; 27(3):171-2. PubMed ID: 17901829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Snaring a silent threat. Chlamydia declining thanks to screening and prevention.
    Hobus P
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2002 Oct; 10(10):63-6. PubMed ID: 12424886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in women's health.
    Oxby A
    Practitioner; 2002 May; 246(1634):314, 318-9, 322. PubMed ID: 12043348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.