84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11935928)
1. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.
Sommers TM; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall DA
J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11935928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device.
Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9656874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating photo-stimulable phosphor plates into dental and dental hygiene radiography curricula.
Tax CL; Robb CL; Brillant MG; Doucette HJ
J Dent Educ; 2013 Nov; 77(11):1451-60. PubMed ID: 24192410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoral radiographic errors.
Patel JR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Nov; 48(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 290948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating student progress through error reduction in intraoral radiographic technique.
Patel JR; Greer DF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 3464923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices.
Sanderink GC; Miles DA
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating digital imaging into dental hygiene practice.
Saxe MJ; West DJ
J Dent Hyg; 1997; 71(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
