These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936147)

  • 1. Research intermediaries: position created to protect vulnerable people who might not have capacity to consent.
    Allen J
    Prot Hum Subj; 2001; ():4-5, 9. PubMed ID: 11936147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
    Derrickson D
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching for effectiveness: the functioning of Connecticut Clinical Ethics Committees.
    Berchelmann K; Blechner B
    J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 12448188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.
    Ramachandran AJ
    J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15239181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany.
    Sass HM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The nurse's role in an research ethics committee].
    Perreault E; Bellemare D
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 16610493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Submitting a research proposal for ethical approval.
    Ayer S
    Prof Nurse; 1994 Sep; 9(12):805-6. PubMed ID: 7938062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of difference: nonaffiliates on IRBs provide alternative views.
    Hurst M
    Prot Hum Subj; 2001; ():1-3. PubMed ID: 11936145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failed community representation: does the process inhibit full IRB participation by community representatives?
    Wallwork E
    Prot Hum Subj; 2003; (9):4, 14. PubMed ID: 16178111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting patients during clinical research.
    Byers JF
    Crit Care Nurse; 2004 Feb; 24(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15007893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.
    Camp JW; Barfield RC; Rodriguez V; Young AJ; Finerman R; Caniza MA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of difference.
    Hurst MM
    IRB; 2001; 23(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12737172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of institutional review boards.
    Ashcraft AS
    Crit Care Nurse; 2004 Jun; 24(3):12; author reply 12. PubMed ID: 15206289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The scientific committee system].
    Kamper-Jørgensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(16):1680-2. PubMed ID: 12756830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethics committees in Northern Europe.
    Holm S
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):54-9. PubMed ID: 15282920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Composition and operation of selected research ethics review committees in Latin America.
    Rivera R; Ezcurra E
    IRB; 2001; 23(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 12737173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.