These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936151)

  • 1. The convergence of abortion regulation in Germany and the United States: a critique of Glendon's Rights Talk thesis.
    Werner U
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1996 Jun; 18(3):571-602. PubMed ID: 11936151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The constitutional law of abortion in Germany: should Americans pay attention?
    Kommers DP
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():1-32. PubMed ID: 10134806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Court and Webster: ethics, politics, and abortion--a panel discussion.
    Gomez CF; Howard AE; Pinkerton J; Childress JF
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 2247520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
    Jubb ED
    Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liberty and community in constitutional law: the abortion cases in comparative perspective.
    Kommer DP
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(3):371-410. PubMed ID: 12186067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homologizing pregnancy and motherhood: a consideration of abortion.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Mich Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 94(2):371-418. PubMed ID: 10160508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: U.S.A. style.
    Pilpel HF
    J Sex Res; 1975 May; 11(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 1142743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction to the translation of the abortion decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany.
    Gorby JD
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 9(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 11663651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
    Walen A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.