These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936170)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus rate and gender on the auditory middle latency response.
    Tucker DA; Dietrich S; Harris S; Pelletier S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Mar; 13(3):146-53; quiz 171-2. PubMed ID: 11936170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stimulus intensity level on auditory middle latency response brain maps in human adults.
    Tucker DA; Dietrich S; McPherson DL; Salamat MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 11392434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory middle latency responses in chronic smokers compared to nonsmokers: differential effects of stimulus and age.
    Ramkissoon I; Beverly BL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):271-84. PubMed ID: 24023379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential age effects for components of the adult auditory middle latency response.
    Chambers RD
    Hear Res; 1992 Mar; 58(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 1568935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the recordability of auditory evoked response component Pb (P1).
    Nelson MD; Hall JW; Jacobson GP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Apr; 8(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9101455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age, signal level, and signal rate on the auditory middle latency response.
    Tucker DA; Ruth RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Apr; 7(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 8652873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory middle latency responses in individuals with debilitating tinnitus.
    Theodoroff S; Chambers R; McMillan R
    Int Tinnitus J; 2011; 16(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 22249868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological changes in the middle latency response using maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Nagle S; Musiek FE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):492-502. PubMed ID: 19764169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulation side on human middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    Yoshiura T; Ueno S; Iramina K; Masuda K
    Neurosci Lett; 1994 May; 172(1-2):159-62. PubMed ID: 8084525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials during increasing doses of fentanyl].
    Schwender D; Klasing S; Tassani P; Rimkus T; Faber-Züllig E; Peter K
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1993 Aug; 28(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 8373974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
    Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
    Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Middle latency response study of auditory evoked potentials amplitudes and lantencies audiologically normal individuals.
    Neves IF; Gonçalves IC; Leite RA; Magliaro FC; Matas CG
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17505602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.
    Sugg MJ; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Nov; 41(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 8608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are chirps better than clicks and tonebursts for evoking middle latency responses?
    Atcherson SR; Moore PC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 25313547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory P3 latency and amplitude: relationships to earlier exogenous auditory events.
    Spongberg T; Decker TN
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 2371538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on ABR threshold, amplitude and latency in neonatal and adult Mongolian gerbils.
    Donaldson GS; Rubel EW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):458-70. PubMed ID: 1701708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory P50 obtained with a repetitive stimulus paradigm shows suppression to high-intensity tones.
    Ninomiya H; Sato E; Onitsuka T; Hayashida T; Tashiro N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Aug; 54(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 10997868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.