102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936177)
1. An optimization algorithm that incorporates IMRT delivery constraints.
Seco J; Evans PM; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(6):899-915. PubMed ID: 11936177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A geometrically based method of step and shoot stereotactic radiosurgery with a miniature multileaf collimator.
St John TJ; Wagner TH; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Meeks SL
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3263-76. PubMed ID: 16177508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the effects of the delivery technique on an IMRT plan: comparison for multiple static field, dynamic and NOMOS MIMiC collimation.
Seco J; Evans PM; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 46(12):3073-87. PubMed ID: 11768492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Li Y; Yao D; Yao J; Chen W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3491-514. PubMed ID: 16030379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Hong TS; Tomé WA; Jaradat H; Raisbeck BM; Ritter MA
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 16938815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
De Meerleer G; Villeirs G; Bral S; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; Dekuyper P; De Neve W
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 15967524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity-modulated vs. conformal radiotherapy of parotid gland tumors: potential impact on hearing loss.
Lamers-Kuijper E; Schwarz M; Rasch C; Mijnheer B
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 17980823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.
Zhu L; Lee L; Ma Y; Ye Y; Mazzeo R; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6653-72. PubMed ID: 18997262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Constraints and dosage for prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy].
Chauvet I; Gaboriaud G; Pontvert D; Zefkili S; Giraud P; Rosenwald JC; Cosset JM
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Dec; 8(6):337-51. PubMed ID: 15619378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]