65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936180)
1. Measurement and correction of the effects of lag on contrast-detail test results in fluoroscopy.
Marshall NW; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(6):947-60. PubMed ID: 11936180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The practical application of signal detection theory to image quality assessment in x-ray image intensifier-TV fluoroscopy.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 46(6):1631-49. PubMed ID: 11419624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of motion unsharpness in digital fluoroscopy.
Kotre CJ; Marshall NW; Guibelalde E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):304-8. PubMed ID: 16461501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of variable temporal averaging in digital fluoroscopy.
Kotre CJ; Guibelalde E
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):675-8. PubMed ID: 15326047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of temporally filtered X-ray fluoroscopy images.
Wilson DL; Jabri KN; Aufrichtig R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 10193694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A video frame-averaging digital fluoroscopic system.
Gould RG
Appl Radiol; 1982; 11(6):83-4, 87-9. PubMed ID: 10299039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of detail and greyscale range in X-ray fluoroscopy images captured with a personal computer and frame-grabber.
Okkalides D
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 23(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 8886729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise reduction in low-dose x-ray fluoroscopy for image-guided radiation therapy.
Wang J; Zhu L; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jun; 74(2):637-43. PubMed ID: 19427563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method to assess the fluidodynamic behaviour of an angiographic contrast agent.
Novario R; Tanzi F; Bianchi C; Lorusso R; Goddi A; Vermiglio G; Conte L
Radiol Med; 2002 Apr; 103(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 12107390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracking quasi-stationary flow of weak fluorescent signals by adaptive multi-frame correlation.
Ji L; Danuser G
J Microsc; 2005 Dec; 220(Pt 3):150-67. PubMed ID: 16363999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
Wenger NA; Tewson DH; McDonald F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of reconstruction techniques in regional cerebral blood flow SPECT using trade-off plots: a Monte Carlo study.
Olsson A; Arlig A; Carlsson GA; Gustafsson A
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Sep; 28(9):719-25. PubMed ID: 17667751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
