These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11936660)

  • 81. Modeling and optimizing of an actual municipal sewage plant: A comparison of diverse multi-objective optimization methods.
    Dai H; Wang Z; Zhao J; Jia X; Liu L; Wang J; Abbasi HN; Guo Z; Chen Y; Geng H; Wang X
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116924. PubMed ID: 36525736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. A Methodology for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Activated Sludge Models: Case Study with Activated Sludge Model No. 3 (ASM3).
    Fortela DLB; Farmer K; Zappi A; Sharp WW; Revellame E; Gang D; Zappi M
    Water Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 91(9):865-876. PubMed ID: 31004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. A note on bound constraints handling for the IEEE CEC'05 benchmark function suite.
    Liao T; Molina D; de Oca MA; Stützle T
    Evol Comput; 2014; 22(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 24479543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Performance comparison of accelerometer calibration algorithms based on 3D-ellipsoid fitting methods.
    Gietzelt M; Wolf KH; Marschollek M; Haux R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 23566707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Activated sludge modelling: development and potential use of a practical applications database.
    Hauduc H; Rieger L; Ohtsuki T; Shaw A; Takács I; Winkler S; Héduit A; Vanrolleghem PA; Gillot S
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(10):2164-82. PubMed ID: 21977635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Single- and double-difference algorithms for position and time-delay calibration of transducer-elements in a sparse array.
    Li Y; Sharp I; Hedley M; Ho P; Guo YJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Jun; 54(6):1188-98. PubMed ID: 17571817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Parameter optimization of water quality model: implementation of genetic algorithm and its control parameters analysis].
    Wang JP; Cheng ST; Jia HF
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 May; 26(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 16124471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Calibration of disease simulation model using an engineering approach.
    Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 19900254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Calibration of model constants in a biological reaction model for sewage treatment plants.
    Amano K; Kageyama K; Watanabe S; Takemoto T
    Water Res; 2002 Feb; 36(4):1025-33. PubMed ID: 11848341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Benchmarking Stochastic Algorithms for Global Optimization Problems by Visualizing Confidence Intervals.
    Liu Q; Chen WN; Deng JD; Gu T; Zhang H; Yu Z; Zhang J
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Sep; 47(9):2924-2937. PubMed ID: 28186918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Application of iterative robust model-based optimal experimental design for the calibration of biocatalytic models.
    Van Daele T; Gernaey KV; Ringborg RH; Börner T; Heintz S; Van Hauwermeiren D; Grey C; Krühne U; Adlercreutz P; Nopens I
    Biotechnol Prog; 2017 Sep; 33(5):1278-1293. PubMed ID: 28675693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters--systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets.
    Brun R; Kühni M; Siegrist H; Gujer W; Reichert P
    Water Res; 2002 Sep; 36(16):4113-27. PubMed ID: 12405420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Theoretical proof of edge search strategy applied to power plant start-up scheduling.
    Kamiya A; Kawai K; Ono I; Kobayashi S
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2002; 32(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 18238130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. SURE-based automatic parameter selection for ESPIRiT calibration.
    Iyer S; Ong F; Setsompop K; Doneva M; Lustig M
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3423-3437. PubMed ID: 32686178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. An efficient multistage algorithm for full calibration of the hemodynamic model from BOLD signal responses.
    Zambri B; Djellouli R; Laleg-Kirati TM
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 28226417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Calibration of forcefields for molecular simulation: sequential design of computer experiments for building cost-efficient kriging metamodels.
    Cailliez F; Bourasseau A; Pernot P
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Jan; 35(2):130-49. PubMed ID: 24318648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Calibration of Smartphone-Based Weather Measurements Using Pairwise Gossip.
    Zamora JL; Kashihara S; Yamaguchi S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():494687. PubMed ID: 26421312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Application of non-linear automatic optimization techniques for calibration of HSPF.
    Iskra I; Droste R
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Jun; 79(6):647-59. PubMed ID: 17605333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Re-evaluating genetic algorithm performance under coordinate rotation of benchmark functions. A survey of some theoretical and practical aspects of genetic algorithms.
    Salomon R
    Biosystems; 1996; 39(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 8894127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Time Consuming Numerical Model Calibration Using Genetic Algorithm (GA), 1-Nearest Neighbor (1NN) Classifier and Principal Component Analysis (PCA).
    Liu Y; Ye WJ
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():1208-11. PubMed ID: 17282410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.