These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11938615)

  • 1. The fundamentals of .... ultrasound equipment.
    Fletcher DE
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2002; 36(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11938615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic ultrasound.
    Dondelinger R
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16544784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systems for research and development in medical ultrasound imaging.
    Weber PK; Lemor RM
    Med Device Technol; 2004 Jun; 15(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 15285488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case for performance testing of diagnostic ultrasound systems.
    Carr JD
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 19480527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of ultrasound formats and how they influence equipment repairs.
    Smith DM
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 19670936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.
    Zemp RJ; Parry MD; Abbey CK; Insana MF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Mar; 24(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 15754981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metrology for ultrasonic applications.
    Zeqiri B
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2007; 93(1-3):138-52. PubMed ID: 17081597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection circuits for ultrasound applications.
    Camacho J; Fritsch C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 May; 55(5):1160-4. PubMed ID: 18519225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinded Comparison between an In-Air Reverberation Method and an Electronic Probe Tester in the Detection of Ultrasound Probe Faults.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2954-2958. PubMed ID: 28967500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Repaired Diagnostic Ultrasound Probes.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2844-2850. PubMed ID: 31327490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement.
    Branca FP; Sciuto SA; Scorza A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Oct; 83(10):105103. PubMed ID: 23126800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of in vitro dental implant primary stability using an ultrasonic method.
    Vayron R; Mathieu V; Michel A; Haïat G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2885-94. PubMed ID: 25308939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Key performance parameters of a contemporary diagnostic ultrasound transducer.
    Moore GW
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 20715353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quick test of ultrasonic transducer arrays radiating in air using B-mode-images.
    Rosenfeld E; Kopp A; Liebscher E; Jenderka KV
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Feb; 59(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24353134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound: present and future.
    Pourcelot L; Lethiecq M; Patat F; Roncin A; Tranquart F; Berson M
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Apr; 4(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8773306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A 1st evaluation by the Ultrasound Professional Society, AGUS - ultrasound update radiology].
    Jung EM; Stroszczynski Ch
    Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 24871389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment.
    Balbis S; Meloni T; Tofani S; Zenone F; Nucera D; Guiot C
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 22359401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating image quality in high-res ultrasound.
    Goldstein A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Dec; 13(12):89-100. PubMed ID: 10149751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manufactory development: ATL. Digital ultrasound: from beamforming to PACs.
    Pesque P; Souquet J
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9 Suppl 3():S312-4. PubMed ID: 10602917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.