BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11939724)

  • 1. Toward objective quality assurance: the eyes don't have it.
    Stoler MH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):520-2. PubMed ID: 11939724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice.
    Austin RM
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
    Calvache AE
    Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interobserver reproducibility: a new approach to quality control by using digital images (D.I. Test).
    Cariaggi MP; Confortini M; Mirri F; Tinacci G
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(3):488-90. PubMed ID: 11393094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.
    Evered A
    Cytopathology; 2007 Oct; 18(5):325-6; author reply 326. PubMed ID: 17883693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New classification in cervical cytology: the Bethesda system].
    Bodó M; Tóth V
    Orv Hetil; 1991 May; 132(19):1039-40. PubMed ID: 2027678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physicians urged to recommend Pap tests to women ages 65 and older--new educational materials now available from NCI.
    NCI
    Del Med J; 2002 Mar; 74(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 11963351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.
    Llewellyn H
    Cytopathology; 1997 Oct; 8(5):349-50; author reply 353-4. PubMed ID: 9313988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.
    Arbyn M; Schenck U; Ellison E; Hanselaar A
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12589640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are we going to the supermarket? Editor's note.
    Rauscher FJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):297-8. PubMed ID: 4684217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.
    Coleman DV; Baker R
    Cytopathology; 1997 Oct; 8(5):350-3; author reply 353-4. PubMed ID: 9313989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are we going to the supermarket?
    Hofmeister FJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 4684216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Guidelines for the evaluation of internal quality control of smears for screening of uterine cancer in France in the structures of Pathologic Anatomy and Cytology. French Association for Quality Assurance in Pathologic Anatomy and Cytology (AFAQAP)--Commission for cervical smears].
    Albuisson F; Anger E; Baron V; Cartier I; Dorne H; Dubois-Gordeff A; Hassoun J; Jouannelle A; Labbé S; Locquet D; Marsan C; Martin E; Michiels-Marzias D; Molinié V; Mottot C; Mueller B; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vincent S; Vuong PN
    Ann Pathol; 1998 Jul; 18(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 9750045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing abnormal Pap smears: comments on two articles.
    Buck HW
    J Am Coll Health; 1989 Sep; 38(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 2778225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing.
    Quarngesser SS
    Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):18. PubMed ID: 10164049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How should adequacy of liquid-based cytology be defined?
    Desai M; Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 16879262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control in cervical cancer screening: Brazilian experience.
    Collaço LM; de Noronha L; Bleggi-Torres LF; Pinheiro DL
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 16450916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Aspects in quality assurance in gynecological cytology].
    Hilgarth M
    Gynakologe; 1990 Dec; 23(6):312-8. PubMed ID: 2279705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.