These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11940609)

  • 1. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods.
    Markolf KL; Zemanovic JR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 11940609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces.
    Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.
    McAllister DR; Markolf KL; Oakes DA; Young CR; McWilliams J
    Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12016068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of bone block position and orientation within the tibial tunnel for posterior cruciate ligament graft reconstructions: a cyclic loading study of bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.
    Markolf K; Davies M; Zoric B; McAllister D
    Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 12975185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Campbell RB; Torrie A; Hecker A; Sekiya JK
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.
    Bergfeld JA; McAllister DR; Parker RD; Valdevit AD; Kambic HE
    Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 11292036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
    Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces.
    Margheritini F; Mauro CS; Rihn JA; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15090372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the "killer turn" in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by fixation level and smoothing the tibial aperture.
    Weimann A; Wolfert A; Zantop T; Eggers AK; Raschke M; Petersen W
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 17916477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graft-bone motion and tensile properties of hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament femoral graft fixation under cyclic loading.
    Brown CH; Wilson DR; Hecker AT; Ferragamo M
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Nov; 20(9):922-35. PubMed ID: 15525925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral fixation sites for optimum isometry of posterolateral reconstruction.
    Sigward SM; Markolf KL; Graves BR; Chacko JM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Nov; 89(11):2359-68. PubMed ID: 17974877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests.
    Hiraga Y; Ishibashi Y; Tsuda E; Toh HT
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 Jan; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16001288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study.
    Simmons R; Howell SM; Hull ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jun; 85(6):1018-29. PubMed ID: 12783997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.
    Markolf KL; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of posterolateral reconstructions on external tibial rotation and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.
    Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Nov; 89(11):2351-8. PubMed ID: 17974876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps tendon fixation with patellar tendon bone plug interference fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Brand J; Hamilton D; Selby J; Pienkowski D; Caborn DN; Johnson DL
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Nov; 16(8):805-12. PubMed ID: 11078536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-stage posterior cruciate ligament inlay reconstruction combining anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction following knee dislocation.
    Chuang TY; Ho WP; Hsieh PH; Yu SW; Chen YJ; Chen CH
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):339.e1-7. PubMed ID: 16517319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.
    Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9070526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
    Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 9070527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with a patellar tendon graft: interference screw versus staple fixation in human knees.
    Gerich TG; Cassim A; Lattermann C; Lobenhoffer HP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997; 5(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 9228314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.