BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11940617)

  • 21. A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Kareh JA; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Jan; 10(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 1727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of surface finish and of vertical ribs on the stability of a cemented femoral stem: an in vitro stair climbing test.
    Jamali AA; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 16446196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses.
    Walker PS; Schneeweis D; Murphy S; Nelson P
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(7):693-702. PubMed ID: 3654667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing proximal femoral pressure during cemented stem insertion.
    Budnar VM; Bannister GC
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 22740281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora.
    Aamodt A; Lund-Larsen J; Eine J; Andersen E; Benum P; Husby OS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Aug; 83(6):921-9. PubMed ID: 11521940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Cristofolini L; Teutonico AS; Monti L; Cappello A; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2003 Nov; 36(11):1603-15. PubMed ID: 14522201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Ong A; Wong KL; Lai M; Garino JP; Steinberg ME
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):786-92. PubMed ID: 12004022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
    Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
    Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Periprosthetic fractures around polished collarless cemented stems: the effect of stem design on fracture pattern.
    Erhardt JB; Khoo PP; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 23813164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monitoring the integrity of the cement-metal interface of total joint components in vitro using acoustic emission and ultrasound.
    Davies JP; Tse MK; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 8872581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; HavlĂ­cek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification.
    Ayers D; Mann K
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7 Suppl 1):103-9. PubMed ID: 14560418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.