292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11940617)
41. Effect of modular neck variation on bone and cement mantle mechanics around a total hip arthroplasty stem.
Simpson DJ; Little JP; Gray H; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 19263573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses.
Kleemann RU; Heller MO; Stoeckle U; Taylor WR; Duda GN
J Orthop Res; 2003 Sep; 21(5):767-74. PubMed ID: 12919861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision.
Mann KA; Ayers DC; Damron TA
J Orthop Res; 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9066528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal.
Phillips TW; Nguyen LT; Munro SD
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2026632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems.
Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micromovement. A mechanical study.
Markolf KL; Amstutz HC; Hirschowitz DL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1980 Dec; 62(8):1315-23. PubMed ID: 7440610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fatigue fracture of a forged cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral component inserted with cement. A report of ten cases.
Woolson ST; Milbauer JP; Bobyn JD; Yue S; Maloney WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1842-8. PubMed ID: 9409798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements?
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):67-72. PubMed ID: 1446456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
Callaghan JJ; Fulghum CS; Glisson RR; Stranne SK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses.
Phillips TW; Messieh SS; McDonald PD
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 May; 72(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 2341442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Use of a genetic algorithm for multiobjective design optimization of the femoral stem of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Ishida T; Nishimura I; Tanino H; Higa M; Ito H; Mitamura Y
Artif Organs; 2011 Apr; 35(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21332564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Role of the collar on the femoral stem of cemented total hip replacements.
Fagan MJ; Lee AJ
J Biomed Eng; 1986 Oct; 8(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 3762109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Kim YH; Oh SH; Kim JS; Koo KH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):675-81. PubMed ID: 12672844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Calcar resorption beneath a well-fitting flanged femoral prosthesis.
O'Hara JN; McMinn DJ
J Arthroplasty; 1991 Jun; 6(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 1875205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Three-dimensional measurement of cemented femoral stem stability: an in vitro cadaver study.
Speirs AD; Slomczykowski MA; Orr TE; Siebenrock K; Nolte LP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 May; 15(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 10675665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
