These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11940727)

  • 1. Reproducibility of DXA in obese women.
    Cordero-MacIntyre ZR; Peters W; Libanati CR; España RC; Abila SO; Howell WH; Lohman TG
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11940727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of body composition by bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in overweight/obese postmenopausal women.
    Fakhrawi DH; Beeson L; Libanati C; Feleke D; Kim H; Quansah A; Darnell A; Lammi-Keefe CJ; Cordero-MacIntyre Z
    J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 19285894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.
    Van Loan MD; Keim NL; Berg K; Mayclin PL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Apr; 27(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 7791591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DXA: can it be used as a criterion reference for body fat measurements in children?
    Shypailo RJ; Butte NF; Ellis KJ
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2008 Feb; 16(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 18239659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults.
    Schoeller DA; Tylavsky FA; Baer DJ; Chumlea WC; Earthman CP; Fuerst T; Harris TB; Heymsfield SB; Horlick M; Lohman TG; Lukaski HC; Shepherd J; Siervogel RM; Borrud LG
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2005 May; 81(5):1018-25. PubMed ID: 15883424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
    Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on pig carcasses.
    Kipper M; Marcoux M; Andretta I; Pomar C
    J Anim Sci; 2018 May; 96(5):2027-2037. PubMed ID: 29722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of EchoMRI-AH versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure human body composition.
    Galgani JE; Smith SR; Ravussin E
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2011 Sep; 35(9):1241-6. PubMed ID: 21224826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement error of DXA: interpretation of fat and lean mass changes in obese and non-obese children.
    Wosje KS; Knipstein BL; Kalkwarf HJ
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 16931353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of body weight and composition measured by two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry devices and three acquisition modes in obese women.
    Genton L; Karsegard VL; Zawadynski S; Kyle UG; Pichard C; Golay A; Hans DB
    Clin Nutr; 2006 Jun; 25(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 16375994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens.
    Swennen Q; Janssens GP; Geers R; Decuypere E; Buyse J
    Poult Sci; 2004 Aug; 83(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 15339010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Investigation Into the Differences in Bone Density and Body Composition Measurements Between 2 GE Lunar Densitometers and Their Comparison to a 4-Component Model.
    Watson LPE; Venables MC; Murgatroyd PR
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(4):498-506. PubMed ID: 28756995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry half-body scans in obese adults.
    Rothney MP; Brychta RJ; Schaefer EV; Chen KY; Skarulis MC
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2009 Jun; 17(6):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19584885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.