178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11943096)
1. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae).
Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen V
Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 11943096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supertree construction in the genomic age.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum likelihood supertrees.
Steel M; Rodrigo A
Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large multi-gene phylogenetic trees of the grasses (Poaceae): progress towards complete tribal and generic level sampling.
Bouchenak-Khelladi Y; Salamin N; Savolainen V; Forest F; Bank Mv; Chase MW; Hodkinson TR
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):488-505. PubMed ID: 18358746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies.
Nye TM
Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 18853364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
Berry V; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supertree bootstrapping methods for assessing phylogenetic variation among genes in genome-scale data sets.
Burleigh JG; Driskell AC; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2006 Jun; 55(3):426-40. PubMed ID: 16861207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel supermatrix approach improves resolution of phylogenetic relationships in a comprehensive sample of danthonioid grasses.
Pirie MD; Humphreys AM; Galley C; Barker NP; Verboom GA; Orlovich D; Draffin SJ; Lloyd K; Baeza CM; Negritto M; Ruiz E; Sanchez JH; Reimer E; Linder HP
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Sep; 48(3):1106-19. PubMed ID: 18599319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: what's in a viverrid-like carnivoran?
Gaubert P; Wozencraft WC; Cordeiro-Estrela P; Veron G
Syst Biol; 2005 Dec; 54(6):865-94. PubMed ID: 16282167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
Reeves PA; Richards CM
Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
