These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11943096)

  • 41. Factors influencing phylogenetic inference: a case study using the mammalian carnivores.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 10877944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Supertree algorithms for ancestral divergence dates and nested taxa.
    Semple C; Daniel P; Hordijk W; Page RD; Steel M
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 20(15):2355-60. PubMed ID: 15073021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phylogenetic relationships among diploid Aegilops species inferred from 5S rDNA units.
    Baum BR; Edwards T; Johnson DA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19527789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.
    Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D; Burleigh JG
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():347-56. PubMed ID: 19455229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The serine repeat antigen (SERA) gene family phylogeny in Plasmodium: the impact of GC content and reconciliation of gene and species trees.
    Bourgon R; Delorenzi M; Sargeant T; Hodder AN; Crabb BS; Speed TP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2161-71. PubMed ID: 15306658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Total evidence, consensus, and bat phylogeny: A distance-based approach.
    Lapointe FJ; Kirsch JA; Hutcheon JM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1999 Feb; 11(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 10082610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Supertrees join the mainstream of phylogenetics.
    Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19022523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The platypus is in its place: nuclear genes and indels confirm the sister group relation of monotremes and Therians.
    van Rheede T; Bastiaans T; Boone DN; Hedges SB; de Jong WW; Madsen O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 16291999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies.
    Agnarsson I; May-Collado LJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Sep; 48(3):964-85. PubMed ID: 18590827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Phylogenetic investigations of Antarctic notothenioid fishes (Perciformes: Notothenioidei) using complete gene sequences of the mitochondrial encoded 16S rRNA.
    Near TJ; Pesavento JJ; Cheng CH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Sep; 32(3):881-91. PubMed ID: 15288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Phylogenetic-signal dissection of nuclear housekeeping genes supports the paraphyly of sponges and the monophyly of Eumetazoa.
    Sperling EA; Peterson KJ; Pisani D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):2261-74. PubMed ID: 19597161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. apTreeshape: statistical analysis of phylogenetic tree shape.
    Bortolussi N; Durand E; Blum M; François O
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):363-4. PubMed ID: 16322049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phylogenetic relationships and heterogeneous evolutionary processes among phrynosomatine sand lizards (Squamata, Iguanidae) revisited.
    Schulte JA; de Queiroz K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):700-16. PubMed ID: 18362078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Missing the forest for the trees: phylogenetic compression and its implications for inferring complex evolutionary histories.
    Ané C; Sanderson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 15805016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Lewis PO; Holder MT; Holsinger KE
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 16012095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.
    Swenson MS; Barbançon F; Warnow T; Linder CR
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 20047664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals.
    Liu FG; Miyamoto MM; Freire NP; Ong PQ; Tennant MR; Young TS; Gugel KF
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1786-9. PubMed ID: 11230694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Conditioned genome reconstruction: how to avoid choosing the conditioning genome.
    Spencer M; Bryant D; Susko E
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 17366135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distances that perfectly mislead.
    Huson DH; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 15205056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.