352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11944652)
1. Genetic testing under the ADA: a case for protection from employment discrimination.
Gridley D
Georgetown Law J; 2001 Apr; 89(4):973-99. PubMed ID: 11944652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An equality paradigm for preventing genetic discrimination.
Silvers A; Stein MA
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 55(5):1341-95. PubMed ID: 15732209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic justice: discrimination by employers and insurance companies based on predictive genetic information.
Ellis AM
Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1071-99. PubMed ID: 15568280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic disability: a modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination.
Chorpening J
North Carol Law Rev; 2004 May; 82(4):1441-81. PubMed ID: 16437812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The asymptomatic ill and genetic discrimination.
Smetanka SL
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Jun; ():14-20. PubMed ID: 10181977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Knickel" and dime issues: an unexplored loophole in New York's genetic discrimination statute and the viability of genetic testing in the sports employment context.
Trumble PD
Albany Law Rev; 2007; 70(2):771-93. PubMed ID: 17486717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bringing your DNA to work: employers' use of genetic testing under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Steinforth KA
Ariz Law Rev; 2001; 43(4):965-1000. PubMed ID: 12611406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legislation and genetic discrimination.
Hoffman S
J Law Health; 2001-2002; 16(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 14650769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a pink slip in my gene? Genetic discrimination in the workplace.
Miller PS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):225-65. PubMed ID: 15015481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic testing and discrimination. How can we protect job and insurance policy applicants from negative test consequences?
Tauer CA
Health Prog; 2001; 82(2):48-53, 71. PubMed ID: 11299881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From laboratories to legislatures ... legislating in the genomic age is harder than policymakers ever thought.
Calvo C
State Legis; 2001 Sep; 27(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 11936165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
Slaughter LM
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-employment inquiries: drug testing, alcohol screening, physical exams, honesty testing, genetics screening--do they discriminate? An empirical study.
Stone DH
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 25(2):367-412. PubMed ID: 16144100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
Feitshans IL
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?
Suter SM
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(3):669-748. PubMed ID: 12741377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ADA at work.
Johnson A
NCSL Legisbrief; 2001; 9(24):1-2. PubMed ID: 11850892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic discrimination and the need for federal legislation.
Quick JJ
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 16538803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bill seeking to ban DNA discrimination isn't really necessary.
Begley S
Wall St J (East Ed); 2004 Feb; ():B1. PubMed ID: 15580696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic privacy and discrimination: a survey of state legislation. Comment.
Mulholland WF; Jaeger AS
Jurimetrics; 1999; 39(3):317-26. PubMed ID: 11762444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act: H.R. 602.
Slaughter L
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12962107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
