139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11944660)
1. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits.
Mellon JN
Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain.
McDonald R
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials.
Roberts H
Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA, not d.o.a.
Nat Genet; 1999 Mar; 21(3):243-4. PubMed ID: 10080165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic witness: by thy DNA so shall ye be known.
Smith DM
Health Law J; 1993; 1():207-44. PubMed ID: 10569856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using colposcopy in the rape exam: health care, forensic, and criminal justice issues.
Canaff RA
J Forensic Nurs; 2005; 1(3):99; author reply 99-100. PubMed ID: 17073039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence on trial.
Enserink M
Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6278):1128-9. PubMed ID: 26965600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
Fleck B; Baldock C
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis.
Mills AE; Tereskerz P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):993-5. PubMed ID: 18779808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping secrets.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 2002 Dec; 133(21):58-60. PubMed ID: 12503490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of DNA statistics in criminal trials.
Henderson JP
Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12175963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA tests in criminal prosecutions. Too much evidence or not enough?
Hoke PA
J Leg Med; 1990 Dec; 11(4):481-512. PubMed ID: 2292668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intellectual property. University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act.
Thursby JG; Thursby MC
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5636):1052. PubMed ID: 12933996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic hair morphology comparison--a dying art or junk science?
Taupin JM
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15112598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promega Corporation reveals primer sequences in its testing kits.
Masibay A; Mozer TJ; Sprecher C
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Nov; 45(6):1360-2. PubMed ID: 11110204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [A modern system of procedural forensic medicine in criminal procedures of the Russian Federation].
Loban IE
Sud Med Ekspert; 2004; 47(5):8-11. PubMed ID: 15523877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Intellectual property. Plants and intellectual property: an international appraisal.
Koo B; Nottenburg C; Pardey PG
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5700):1295-7. PubMed ID: 15550646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA typing: a most useful forensic tool.
Palermo GB
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 16943375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
