139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11944660)
21. Intellectual property. U.S. patent reform begins long journey through Congress.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1725-6. PubMed ID: 15961638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Reform of forensic autopsy in the German Code of Criminal Procedure].
Parzeller M; Dettmeyer R; Bratzke H
Arch Kriminol; 2010; 225(3-4):73-80. PubMed ID: 20506706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Standards of DNA laboratories, criterium of Polish Society of Forensic Medicine and Criminology].
Komisja Genetyki Sadowej Polskiego Towarzystwa Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 15984128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The prosecutor's and defendant's Bayesian nomograms.
Riancho JA; Zarrabeitia MT
Int J Legal Med; 2002 Oct; 116(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 12376846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Health-care patents and interests of patients.
Luthra R
Bull World Health Organ; 2006 Nov; 84(11):919. PubMed ID: 17143470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Public access versus proprietary rights in genomic information: what is the proper role of intellectual property rights?
Mueller JM
J Health Care Law Policy; 2003; 6(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 15017961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of forensic DNA evidence in prosecutors'offices.
Prottas JM; Noble AA
J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17518857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The DNA detectives.
Adler J; McCormick J
Newsweek; 1998 Nov; 132(20):66-71. PubMed ID: 10187095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.
Boettiger S; Bennett AB
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Forensic epidemiology: law at the intersection of public health and criminal investigations.
Goodman RA; Munson JW; Dammers K; Lazzarini Z; Barkley JP
J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):684-700. PubMed ID: 14968670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Intellectual property. Enhanced: intellectual property landscape of the human genome.
Jensen K; Murray F
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5746):239-40. PubMed ID: 16224006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. DNA fingerprinting reconsidered (again).
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1992 Jul; 267(1):26. PubMed ID: 1502508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. International criminal court.
Metcalf J; Ranson D
J Law Med; 2002 Aug; 10(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 12242877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Commentary on McBay AJ. Cocaine sentencing. J Forensic Sci 1996 Jan;41(1):3-4.
Heagy JA
J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):1086-9. PubMed ID: 8914302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Intellectual property protection for plant innovation: unresolved issues after J.E.M. v. Pioneer.
Janis MD; Kesan JP
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1161-4. PubMed ID: 12410257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Some issues of forensic medical expertise within civil processes in the light of provisions of the new civil procedural code of the Russian Federation].
Pashinian GA; Romadonovskiĭ PO; Pashinian AG; Beliaeva EV; Tangieva TA
Sud Med Ekspert; 2004; 47(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 15523876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical treatment inventions.
Soames C
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2005 Dec; 4(12):951. PubMed ID: 16370074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Patent law: avoiding pitfalls].
Kruspig RA
Chirurg; 2006 Nov; Suppl():354-5. PubMed ID: 17598272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
Summers TM
Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
