183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11948471)
1. Completeness and accuracy of registration of ovarian cancer in the cancer registry of Norway.
Tingulstad S; Halvorsen T; Norstein J; Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE
Int J Cancer; 2002 Apr; 98(6):907-11. PubMed ID: 11948471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness of invasive cervical cancer at the Cancer Registry of Norway.
Bilet EF; Langseth H; Thoresen SØ; Bray F
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(7):1070-3. PubMed ID: 19353339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The completeness and accuracy of health authority and cancer registry records according to a study of ovarian neoplasms.
Mukherjee AK; Leck I; Langley FA; Ashcroft C
Public Health; 1991 Jan; 105(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 2008506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of prostate cancer data in the cancer registry of Norway.
Harvei S; Tretli S; Langmark F
Eur J Cancer; 1996 Jan; 32A(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 8695215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Larsen IK; Småstuen M; Johannesen TB; Langmark F; Parkin DM; Bray F; Møller B
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1218-1231. PubMed ID: 19091545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The completeness and accuracy of the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry.
Dyrkorn OA; Staff AC; Kulseng-Hanssen S; Dimoski T; Svenningsen R
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Dec; 99(12):1618-1625. PubMed ID: 32640493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of data reported on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair--a comparison between a national vascular and a national administrative registry.
Haug ES; Romundstad P; Saether OD; Jørgenvåg R; Myhre HO
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 29(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 15878531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of ovarian cancer histopathology by registry pathologists and referral pathologists: a study by the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry.
Piver MS; Tsukada Y; Werness BA; DiCioccio RA; Whittemore AS; Ponder BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 10926797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Primary ovarian cancer. A comparison of registrations in the Danish Cancer Registry and the Pathology Data Bank].
Kjaerbye-Thygesen A; Huusom LD; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK;
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jan; 169(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 17217888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low proportion of unreported cervical treatments in the cancer registry of Norway between 1998 and 2013.
Leinonen MK; Hansen SA; Skare GB; Skaaret IB; Silva M; Johannesen TB; Nygård M
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 30169991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and completeness of registration of surgically treated malignant gynaecological diseases in the Danish National Hospital Registry.
Kjaergaard J; Clemmensen IH; Storm HH
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11822728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries.
Cress RD; Zaslavsky AM; West DW; Wolf RE; Felter MC; Ayanian JZ
Med Care; 2003 Sep; 41(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 12972840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study of completeness of registration at the Estonian cancer registry.
Lang K; Mägi M; Aareleid T
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2003 Apr; 12(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 12671539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial.
Verleye L; Ottevanger PB; Kristensen GB; Ehlen T; Johnson N; van der Burg ME; Reed NS; Verheijen RH; Gaarenstroom KN; Mosgaard B; Seoane JM; van der Velden J; Lotocki R; van der Graaf W; Penninckx B; Coens C; Stuart G; Vergote I
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 20850296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Is registration of multiple myeloma in the Norwegian Cancer Registry good enough?].
Aasbrenn M; Langmark F; Wisløff F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2712-4. PubMed ID: 19079417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry: an overview of completeness, timeliness, comparability and validity.
Moberger P; Sköldberg F; Birgisson H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1611-1621. PubMed ID: 30477372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Registration of primary ovarian cancer in Denmark].
Petri AL; Høgdall C; Lidegaard O
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Feb; 171(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19208328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of ovarian cancer ICD-10 diagnosis in a Danish population-based hospital discharge registry.
Tetsche MS; Nørgaard M; Skriver MV; Andersen ES; Lash TL; Sørensen HT
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 15991523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating Completeness of Cancer Registration in Iran with Capture-Recapture Methods.
Mohammadi G; Akbari ME; Mehrabi Y; Ghanbari Motlagh A; Partovi Pour E; Roshandel G; Khosravi A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(S3):93-9. PubMed ID: 27165215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
