182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11948471)
21. Completeness and accuracy of national cancer and death registration for outcome ascertainment in trials-an ovarian cancer exemplar.
Kalsi JK; Ryan A; Gentry-Maharaj A; Margolin-Crump D; Singh N; Burnell M; Benjamin E; Apostolidou S; Habib M; Massingham S; Karpinskyj C; Woolas R; Widschwendter M; Fallowfield L; Campbell S; Skates S; McGuire A; Parmar M; Jacobs I; Menon U
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):88. PubMed ID: 33494753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using hospital discharge files to enhance cancer surveillance.
Penberthy L; McClish D; Pugh A; Smith W; Manning C; Retchin S
Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 12835284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.
Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Value of Pathology Review in a Population-based Series of Ovarian Tumors.
Stewart CJR; Stewart LM; Holman CDJ; Jordan S; Semmens J; Spilsbury K; Threlfall T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2017 Jul; 36(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 27801762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
Malin JL; Kahn KL; Adams J; Kwan L; Laouri M; Ganz PA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):835-44. PubMed ID: 12048271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Completeness of a newly implemented general cancer registry in northern France: Application of a three-source capture-recapture method.
Plouvier SD; Bernillon P; Ligier K; Theis D; Miquel PH; Pasquier D; Rivest LP
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2019 Jul; 67(4):239-245. PubMed ID: 31146902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality of urological cancer diagnoses in the Danish National Registry of Patients.
Gammelager H; Christiansen CF; Johansen MB; Borre M; Schoonen M; Sørensen HT
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 22433631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Overestimated risk of second primary malignancies in ovarian cancer patients.
Bergfeldt K; Silfverswärd C; Einhorn S; Hall P
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 36(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 10741302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Data quality at the Singapore Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Fung JW; Lim SB; Zheng H; Ho WY; Lee BG; Chow KY; Lee HP
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 43():76-86. PubMed ID: 27399312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating the Completeness of Lung Cancer Registry in Ardabil, Iran with a Three-Source Capture-Recapture Method.
Khodadost M; Mosavi-Jarrahi A; Hashemian SS; Sarvi F; Maajani K; Moradpour F; Khatibi SR; Amini H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(S3):225-9. PubMed ID: 27165230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Data quality audit of the arthroplasty clinical outcomes registry NSW.
Seagrave KG; Naylor J; Armstrong E; Leong KM; Descallar J; Harris IA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():512. PubMed ID: 25410899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the concordance of trauma registry data and hospital records.
McKenzie K; Walker S; Besenyei A; Aitken LM; Allison B
Health Inf Manag; 2005; 34(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 18239222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of data from the Norwegian Patient Register and the Cancer Registry of Norway.
Bakken IJ; Gystad SO; Christensen ØO; Huse UE; Larønningen S; Nygård J; Holmstrøm L; Johannesen TB; Møller B; Larsen IK
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Jun; 132(11):1336-40. PubMed ID: 22717858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Completeness of registration of oral clefts in a medical birth registry: a population-based study.
Kubon C; Sivertsen A; Vindenes HA; Abyholm F; Wilcox A; Lie RT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(12):1453-7. PubMed ID: 17851803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.
Sigurdardottir LG; Jonasson JG; Stefansdottir S; Jonsdottir A; Olafsdottir GH; Olafsdottir EJ; Tryggvadottir L
Acta Oncol; 2012 Sep; 51(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 22974093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of epithelial ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer and ovarian borderline tumor data in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database.
Petri AL; Kjaer SK; Christensen IJ; Blaakaer J; Hogdall E; Jeppesen U; Mosgaard BJ; Pagel JD; Stilling L; Thranov I; Hogdall C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 19308749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The data quality of haematological malignancy ICD-10 diagnoses in a population-based hospital discharge registry.
Nørgaard M; Skriver MV; Gregersen H; Pedersen G; Schønheyder HC; Sørensen HT
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 15901987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Completeness of cancer registry data in a small Iranian province: A capture-recapture approach.
Fararouei M; Marzban M; Shahraki G
Health Inf Manag; 2017 May; 46(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 27702791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity of breast cancer in the Danish Cancer Registry. A study based on clinical records from one county in Denmark.
Jensen AR; Overgaard J; Storm HH
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2002 Aug; 11(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 12195162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
