149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11950523)
1. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Velenovsky DS; Glattke TJ
Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 11950523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
Stuart A; Butler AK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Ryan S; Kemp DT
Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
Stuart A; Preast JL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Contralateral Inhibition of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Suggest Sex or Ear Laterality Effects?
Stuart A; Kerls AN
Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):272-282. PubMed ID: 29946686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TEOAE suppression in adults with learning disabilities.
Garinis AC; Glattke T; Cone-Wesson BK
Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):607-14. PubMed ID: 18923982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
Durante AS; Carvalho RM
Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
Stuart A; Cobb KM
J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.
Goodman SS; Mertes IB; Lewis JD; Weissbeck DK
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):829-42. PubMed ID: 23982894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Derived narrow-band contributions.
Molenaar DG; Shaw G; Eggermont JJ
Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):208-22. PubMed ID: 10771198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
Lisowska G; Smurzynski J; Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Probst R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
