These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11951811)

  • 1. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants.
    Kohal RJ; Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Tripodakis A; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Yeung TC; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):e49-57. PubMed ID: 22848900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications.
    Toksavul S; Zor M; Toman M; Güngör MA; Nergiz I; Artunç C
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
    Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of custom-made ceramic dowel made using CAD/CAM technology.
    Marghalani TY; Hamed MT; Awad MA; Naguib GH; Elragi AF
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 21(6):440-50. PubMed ID: 22672191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.