These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1195240)
1. Evidence of the Royal College of General Practitioners to the Select Committee of Parliament on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill. The Council of the Royal College of General Practitioners J R Coll Gen Pract; 1975 Oct; 25(159):774-6. PubMed ID: 1195240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. By the London Post. The abortion law reviewed--free contraception--angry angels. Lister J N Engl J Med; 1974 Jul; 291(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 4599659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do we judge the Abortion Act/ Reflections on the Lane Committee and the 1967 Abortion Act. Simms M Public Health; 1973 Jul; 87(5):155-64. PubMed ID: 4802498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion policy and politics on the Lane Committee of Enquiry, 1971-1974. Wivel A Soc Hist Med; 1998 Apr; 11(1):109-35. PubMed ID: 11620152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. History of the Royal College of General Practitioners--the first 40 years. Gray DP Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Jan; 42(354):29-35. PubMed ID: 1586530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. General practitioners and abortion. Evidence to the committee on the working of the Abortion Act. Cartwright A; Waite M J R Coll Gen Pract; 1972 Aug; 22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-24. PubMed ID: 4668421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]