These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11954691)

  • 1. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Perception; 2006; 35(11):1473-83. PubMed ID: 17286118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A sideways look at configural encoding: two different effects of face rotation.
    Lewis MB; Glenister TE
    Perception; 2003; 32(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 12613782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity.
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2000; 29(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 11145082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Wheeler KG; Cipolli C; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178895. PubMed ID: 28582439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task.
    Edmonds AJ; Lewis MB
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):446-60. PubMed ID: 17455758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Fischer MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16082532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.