These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11954806)

  • 1. Comparison of single-phase and high-frequency generators for x-ray units.
    Barthez PY; Manwaring N; Mitelmann PH; Benoit E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2002; 43(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 11954806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lowering patient dose on single-phase X-ray units.
    Fung K
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):159-64; quiz 165-6. PubMed ID: 7708914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mAs and kVp on resolution and on image contrast.
    Thunthy KH; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Sep; 46(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 278941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FFT analysis of the X-ray tube voltage waveforms of high-frequency generators for radiographic systems.
    Chida K; Saito H; Ito D; Shimura H; Zuguchi M; Takai Y
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):810-4. PubMed ID: 16392605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Behrman RH
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray generators.
    Seibert JA
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(6):1533-57. PubMed ID: 9397462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A calibration system for X-ray generators and tube factors.
    Healey T; Dickson DG; Greenwood MW
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Jan; 52(613):44-50. PubMed ID: 427351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
    Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: a comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems.
    Cooper VN; Oshiro T; Cagnon CH; Bassett LW; McLeod-Stockmann TM; Bezrukiy NV
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2614-21. PubMed ID: 14596297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
    Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body size and tube voltage-dependent guiding equations for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.
    Zheng X
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 29667102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A method of image enhancement in the use of hydrosoluble uro-angiographic contrast media].
    Novario R; Minotto R; Monciardini M; Di Massa A; Zuccoli M; Cassani E; Conte L
    Radiol Med; 1995 May; 89(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 7617912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging.
    Yao Y; Ng JM; Megibow AJ; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4877. PubMed ID: 27487905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a zoomorphic test specimen for constancy testing on digital X-ray systems in veterinary radiology.
    Pöhlmann G; Lüpke M; Seiler C; Wefstaedt P; Bach JP; Nolte I; Seifert H
    Acta Vet Scand; 2019 Aug; 61(1):40. PubMed ID: 31429771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of an image planning system for kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy.
    Thapa BB; Molloy JA
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061703. PubMed ID: 23718582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.