These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11955663)
41. Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan). Sugiyama M; Akita M; Alépée N; Fujishiro M; Hagino S; Handa Y; Ikeda H; Imai N; Jitsukawa S; Katoh M; Kurihara K; Kyotani D; Nomura S; Okamoto Y; Okumura H; Omori T; Sugibayashi K; Todo H; Toyoda A; Ohno Y J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(12):751-768. PubMed ID: 30518713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Isolated Chicken Eye test to replace the Draize test in rabbits. Prinsen MK; Hendriksen CFM; Krul CAM; Woutersen RA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():132-149. PubMed ID: 28192172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. In vitro irritation models and immune reactions. Gibbs S Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2009; 22(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 19188758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Alternative methods for the replacement of eye irritation testing. Lotz C; Schmid FF; Rossi A; Kurdyn S; Kampik D; De Wever B; Walles H; Groeber FK ALTEX; 2016; 33(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26626125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Industry experience with alternative methods. LeClaire J; de Silva O Toxicol Lett; 1998 Dec; 102-103():575-9. PubMed ID: 10022316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The isolated chicken eye test as a suitable in vitro method for determining the eye irritation potential of household cleaning products. Schutte K; Prinsen MK; McNamee PM; Roggeband R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 19460408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. In vitro skin corrosion: Human skin model test - A validation study. Deshmukh GR; Kumar KH; Reddy PV; Rao BS Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1072-4. PubMed ID: 22542585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Introduction of in vitro data into local irritation/corrosion testing strategies by means of SAR considerations: assessment of chemicals. Gerner I; Schlede E Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):169-75. PubMed ID: 12052655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Use of HPLC/UPLC-spectrophotometry for detection of formazan in in vitro Reconstructed human Tissue (RhT)-based test methods employing the MTT-reduction assay to expand their applicability to strongly coloured test chemicals. Alépée N; Barroso J; De Smedt A; De Wever B; Hibatallah J; Klaric M; Mewes KR; Millet M; Pfannenbecker U; Tailhardat M; Templier M; McNamee P Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Jun; 29(4):741-61. PubMed ID: 25701760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Final report of the safety assessment of L-Ascorbic Acid, Calcium Ascorbate, Magnesium Ascorbate, Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Sodium Ascorbate, and Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate as used in cosmetics. Elmore AR Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():51-111. PubMed ID: 16154915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic products and new challenges. Filaire E; Nachat-Kappes R; Laporte C; Harmand MF; Simon M; Poinsot C Int J Cosmet Sci; 2022 Dec; 44(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 35842748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The use and interpretation of in vitro data in regulatory toxicology: cosmetics, toiletries and household products. Indans I Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12052656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Establishment and evaluation of immortalized human epidermal keratinocytes for an alternative skin irritation test. Kim CW; Kim CD; Choi KC J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2017; 88(Pt 2):130-139. PubMed ID: 28827132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The chicken enucleated eye test (CEET): a practical (pre)screen for the assessment of eye irritation/corrosion potential of test materials. Prinsen MK Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 34(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 8621111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Final report on the safety assessment of 6-Amino-m-Cresol, 6-Amino-o-Cresol, 4-Amino-m-Cresol, 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol, 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol, and 4-Chloro-2-Aminophenol. Int J Toxicol; 2004; 23 Suppl 2():1-22. PubMed ID: 15513822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24. Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods Skin Irritation Task Force report 2. Zuang V; Balls M; Botham PA; Coquette A; Corsini E; Curren RD; Elliott GR; Fentem JH; Heylings JR; Liebsch M; Medina J; Roguet R; van de Sandt JJ; Wiemann C; Worth AP Altern Lab Anim; 2002; 30(1):109-29. PubMed ID: 11827575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Criteria for in vitro alternatives for the eye irritation test. Green S; Chambers WA; Gupta KC; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lambert LA; Lee CC; Lee JK; Liu PT; Lowther DK Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 8449460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes. Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]