BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11956305)

  • 1. Comparison of the results of radical hysterectomy: sequential observations in each period.
    Kobamatsu Y; Yamamoto R; Kaneuchi M; Mitamura T; Minobe S; Todo Y; Takeda M; Okamoto K; Nomura E; Negishi H; Sakuragi N; Fujimoto S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 Mar; 32(3):103-7. PubMed ID: 11956305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Jensen JK; Lucci JA; DiSaia PJ; Manetta A; Berman ML
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 8244174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharmacokinetics of cephem antibiotics in exudate of pelvic retroperitoneal space after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Ito K; Hayasaki M; Tamaya T
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1990 Jun; 34(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 2393276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antibiotic prophylaxis for radical abdominal hysterectomy.
    Bendvold E; Kjorstad KE
    Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Oct; 28(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 3666577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prophylactic topical cefamandole in radical hysterectomy.
    Miyazawa K; Hernandez E; Dillon MB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Apr; 25(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 2884138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficacy of short-term versus long-term cefoxitin prophylaxis against postoperative infection after radical hysterectomy: a prospective study.
    Sevin BU; Ramos R; Gerhardt RT; Guerra L; Hilsenbeck S; Averette HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):729-34. PubMed ID: 2014087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. T-tube suction drainage and/or prophylactic antibiotics. A randomized study of 451 hysterectomies.
    Swartz WH; Tanaree P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 47(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 934556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of nonperitonization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for minimizing the incidence of lymphocyst formation after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Park NY; Seong WJ; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 20375812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy in cervical cancer with retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Li XL; Chen ZY; Cui YC; Sheng XG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):903-9. PubMed ID: 25822099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.
    Malur S; Possover M; Schneider A
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 11344431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications in gynecologic surgery].
    Zivný J; Mára M; Jedlicková A; Fucíková Z; Krejcí V; Dohnalová J
    Ceska Gynekol; 1997 Aug; 62(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 9600153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.
    Roy M; Plante M; Renaud MC; Têtu B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 8812529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence and predictors of febrile morbidity after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer patients.
    Kietpeerakool C; Lattiwongsakorn W; Srisomboon J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 18712961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suction drainage as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for hysterectomy.
    Swartz WH; Tanaree P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Mar; 45(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 1113948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
    Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of antibiotics in the prevention of infections following vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: an evaluation by febrile morbidity and fever index].
    Tabei T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1983 Jul; 36(7):1569-80. PubMed ID: 6361316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Contribution of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operability of cancers of the uterine cervix].
    Sláma J; Cibula D; Freitag P; Fischerová D; Janousek M; Pavlista D; Strunová M; Zikán M; Jancárková N
    Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Apr; 72(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 17639733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.