These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11957326)
1. Divided loyalties. Legal and bioethical considerations of physician-pregnant patient confidentiality and prenatal drug abuse. Plambeck CM J Leg Med; 2002 Mar; 23(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11957326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries. Chavkin W; Breitbart V Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ACLU philosophy and the right to abuse the unborn. Johnson PE Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11650911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. When becoming pregnant is a crime. Paltrow LM Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11650910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings. Moss KL Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection. Phillips M Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory. McGinnis DM Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal abuse: culpable behavior by pregnant women or parental immunity? Smith GP J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 11652567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy. Myers JE Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy. Janssen ND Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case. Weyrauch S Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights? Persels J J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women. Annas GJ Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts. Oberman M Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex, drugs, and pregnant addicts: an ethical and legal critique of societal responses to pregnant addicts. Oberman M J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 2131072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Terry J Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Baby X. Michigan. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1980 Apr; 293():736-41. PubMed ID: 12041135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dilemmas of providers treating pregnant mothers who use drugs: patient confidentiality versus the duty to report drug use. Van Grunsven P J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 10172636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]