158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11957391)
1. Evaluating the effectiveness of student assistance programs in Pennsylvania.
Fertman CI; Fichter C; Schlesinger J; Tarasevich S; Wald H; Zhang X
J Drug Educ; 2001; 31(4):353-66. PubMed ID: 11957391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of student assistance programs in Nebraska schools.
Scott DM; Surface JL; Friedli D; Barlow TW
J Drug Educ; 1999; 29(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 10429357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Universal School-Based Screening vs Targeted Screening for Major Depressive Disorder Among Adolescents: A Trial Protocol for the Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate, and Lower Depression (SHIELD) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sekhar DL; Pattison KL; Confair A; Molinari A; Schaefer EW; Waxmonsky JG; Walker-Harding LR; Rosen P; Kraschnewski JL
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1914427. PubMed ID: 31675086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons Learned from an Academic Partnership to Review Pennsylvania Network for Student Assistance Services' Annual Survey.
Sekhar DL; Schaefer EW; Hoke AM; Rosen P; Chuzie RA; Milakovic DM
J Sch Health; 2024 Mar; 94(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 37553008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pearls and pitfalls in evaluating a Student Assistance Program: a five-year case study.
Wilburn ST; Wilburn KT; Weaver DM; Bowles K
J Drug Educ; 2007; 37(4):447-67. PubMed ID: 18351182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Collaborative Analysis of Trends in Referrals to the Pennsylvania Student Assistance Program from 2013 to 2018.
Sekhar DL; Schaefer EW; Hoke AM; Rosen P; Chuzie RA; Milakovic DM
J Sch Health; 2023 Apr; 93(4):331-339. PubMed ID: 36404435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Foy JM; Earls MF
Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Back to the basics: identifying positive youth development as the theoretical framework for a youth drug prevention program in rural Saskatchewan, Canada amidst a program evaluation.
Dell CA; Duncan CR; DesRoches A; Bendig M; Steeves M; Turner H; Quaife T; McCann C; Enns B
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2013 Oct; 8():36. PubMed ID: 24148918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of an independent evaluation of Project ALERT delivered in schools by Cooperative Extension.
St Pierre TL; Osgood DW; Mincemoyer CC; Kaltreider DL; Kauh TJ
Prev Sci; 2005 Dec; 6(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 16160759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the All Stars Program: student and teacher factors that influence mediators of substance use.
Giles SM; Harrington NG; Fearnow-Kenney M
J Drug Educ; 2001; 31(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 11957393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in the use of a school mental health program in secondary schools.
Fertman CI; Ross JL
Am J Health Behav; 2003; 27(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 12639072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a Student Assistance Program.
Milgram GG
J Drug Educ; 1989; 19(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 2621539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outlook is G.R.E.A.T.: What educators say about school-based prevention and the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program.
Peterson D; Esbensen FA
Eval Rev; 2004 Jun; 28(3):218-45. PubMed ID: 15130182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How one community provides crisis intervention/mental health services.
Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1995 Sep; 16(5):13-4. PubMed ID: 10151261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate, and Lower Depression Among Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sekhar DL; Schaefer EW; Waxmonsky JG; Walker-Harding LR; Pattison KL; Molinari A; Rosen P; Kraschnewski JL
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2131836. PubMed ID: 34739064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond the schools: strategies for implementing successful drug prevention programs in community youth-serving organizations.
Kaltreider DL; St Pierre TL
J Drug Educ; 1995; 25(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 7500225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes about AIDS education and condom availability among parents of high school students in New York City: a focus group approach.
Rafferty Y; Radosh A
AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1):14-30. PubMed ID: 9083588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feedback from participants and leaders in an intervention program: the 1997-1998 opening doors process evaluation.
Rye BJ; Humpartzoomian R; Steep B
J Drug Educ; 2001; 31(2):185-206. PubMed ID: 11487994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy vs effectiveness trial results of an indicated "model" substance abuse program: implications for public health.
Hallfors D; Cho H; Sanchez V; Khatapoush S; Kim HM; Bauer D
Am J Public Health; 2006 Dec; 96(12):2254-9. PubMed ID: 16809591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlates of perceived effectiveness of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative.
Ellis B; Alford A; Yu P; Xiong S; Hill G; Puckett M; Mannix D; Wells ME
Eval Program Plann; 2012 May; 35(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 22142869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
