These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11958230)

  • 1. Family law--contract--Supreme Court of New Jersey holds that preembryo disposition agreements are not binding when one party later objects.--J.B. v. M.B., No. A-9-00, 2001 WL 909294 (N.J. Aug. 14, 2001).
    Harv Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 115(2):701-8. PubMed ID: 11958230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations.
    Petersen SD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
    Ellis M
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B.
    Issa F
    Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. J.B. v. M.B.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Wests Atl Report; 2001; 783():707-20. PubMed ID: 16285109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
    Malo PE
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
    Crockin SL
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
    Rosado M
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
    King M
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
    Waldman EA
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
    Katz DA
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precommitment stategies [sic] for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Emory Law J; 2001; 50(4):989-1046. PubMed ID: 12956135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The frozen embryo and divorce.
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1989; 11(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 11650246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Halakhic approaches to the resolution of disputes concerning the disposition of preembryos.
    Breitowitz YA
    Tradition; 1996; 31(1):64-91. PubMed ID: 11654662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Court says woman can bar embryos' use.
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():B6. PubMed ID: 12155241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.