553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11958406)
1. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method.
Nakamura T; Imanishi A; Kashima H; Ohyama T; Ishigaki S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 12066632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Splinting effect on posterior implants under various loading modes: a 3D finite element analysis.
Hauchard E; Fournier BP; Jacq R; Bouton A; Pierrisnard L; Naveau A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Sep; 19(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 22645793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
