254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11958650)
1. Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system.
MacKenzie MA; Lachaine M; Murray B; Fallone BG; Robinson D; Field GC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 11958650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Burman C; Chui CS; Kutcher G; Leibel S; Zelefsky M; LoSasso T; Spirou S; Wu Q; Yang J; Stein J; Mohan R; Fuks Z; Ling CC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Nov; 39(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 9369136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic feathering of split fields for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Dogan N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A; Emami B
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1133-40. PubMed ID: 12765327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verification of inverse planning and treatment delivery for segmental IMRT.
Bedford JL; Childs PJ; Warrington AP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(2):1-17. PubMed ID: 15738908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments.
Van Esch A; Bohsung J; Sorvari P; Tenhunen M; Paiusco M; Iori M; Engström P; Nyström H; Huyskens DP
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Oct; 65(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 12413675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation.
Mihaylov IB; Lerma FA; Wu Y; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):828-39. PubMed ID: 16696458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for photon beam Monte Carlo multileaf collimator particle transport.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Kim JO; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3225-49. PubMed ID: 12361220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generation of wedge-shaped dose distributions through dynamic multileaf collimator dose delivery.
Zhu J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(3):37-45. PubMed ID: 16143790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(3):37-54. PubMed ID: 15753938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity-modulated radiation therapy beams.
Zygmanski P; Rosca F; Kadam D; Lorenz F; Nalichowski A; Court L; Chin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 8(4):76-95. PubMed ID: 18449158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A topographic leaf-sequencing algorithm for delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Desai D; Ramsey CR; Breinig M; Mahan SL
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2751-6. PubMed ID: 16964850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator.
Agazaryan N; Solberg TD
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1758-67. PubMed ID: 12906193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RapidArc patient specific mechanical delivery accuracy under extreme mechanical limits using linac log files.
Wijesooriya K; Aliotta E; Benedict S; Read P; Rich T; Larner J
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1846-53. PubMed ID: 22482606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical model of electronic portal imager response implemented within a commercial treatment planning system for verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields.
Khan RFH; Ostapiak OZ; Szabo JJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 9(4):135-150. PubMed ID: 19020485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
