173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11958699)
1. A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less?
Bussière LF
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):309-17. PubMed ID: 11958699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
O'Donald P
Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of avian parental care.
Burley NT; Johnson K
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):241-50. PubMed ID: 11958693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A review of causes and consequences of monogamy.
Kvarnemo C
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Nov; 93(4):1795-1812. PubMed ID: 29687607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
Sandvik M; Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2151-5. PubMed ID: 11413626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.
Tregenza T; Wedell N
Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):71-3. PubMed ID: 11780118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity.
Schacht R; Bell AV
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32472. PubMed ID: 27600189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
Kokko H; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: game-theoretical and two-locus diploid models.
Wakano JY; Ihara Y
Am Nat; 2005 Aug; 166(2):E32-44. PubMed ID: 16032569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males?
Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI
J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clutch size evolution under sexual conflict enhances the stability of mating systems.
Smith HG; Härdling R
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2163-70. PubMed ID: 11413628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of filial cannibalism and female mate choice strategies as resolutions to sexual conflict in fishes.
Lindström K
Evolution; 2000 Apr; 54(2):617-27. PubMed ID: 10937237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Devoted fathers or selfish lovers? Conflict between mating effort and parental care in a harem-defending arachnid.
Alissa LM; Muniz DG; Machado G
J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 27758054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation.
Kelly CD; Jennions MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Nov; 86(4):863-84. PubMed ID: 21414127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
