These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Sequence computerized tomography in the evaluation of renal transplant function]. Treugut H; Nyman U; Hildell J; Molde A Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1982; 46(5-6):263-70. PubMed ID: 6763213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Power Doppler ultrasonography compared with scintigraphy in the diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction. Isiklar I; Aktas A; Uzuner O; Demirag A; Haberal M Transplant Proc; 1999 Dec; 31(8):3330-1. PubMed ID: 10616495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Interpretation of duplex Doppler ultrasound in renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Stevens PE; Gwyther SJ; Hanson ME; Woodrow DF; Phillips ME; Boultbee JE Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1993; 8(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 8385295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic value of resistive index of renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Saarinen O Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 2031803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy in renal transplantation. Limitations related to the immunosuppressor used]. Malfi B; Picciotto G; Manzione A; Turello E; Squiccimarro G; Messina M; Segoloni GP Minerva Urol Nefrol; 1993 Mar; 45(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 8322112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal transplants: applications and future directions. Harvey CJ; Sidhu PS; Bachmann Nielsen M Ultraschall Med; 2013 Aug; 34(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 23929378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Differential diagnostic evaluation of a dysfunctional kidney transplant by magnetic resonance tomography]. Sievers KW; Kruschke A; Albrecht KH; Walz M Urologe A; 1995 Nov; 34(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 8848860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sonography of renal transplants in dogs: the effect of acute tubular necrosis, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and acute rejection on resistive index and renal length. Pozniak MA; Kelcz F; D'Alessandro A; Oberley T; Stratta R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Apr; 158(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 1546594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical transplant physical examination: correlation of renal resistance index and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy. Elster EA; Hale DA; Mannon RB; Cendales LC; Kleiner D; Swanson SJ; Kirk AD J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 15804469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the renal transplant. Rodgers SK; Sereni CP; Horrow MM Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 52(6):1307-24. PubMed ID: 25444108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reversed diastolic blood flow at duplex Doppler. A sign of poor prognosis in renal transplants. Saarinen O; Salmela K; Ahonen J; Edgren J Acta Radiol; 1994 Jan; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 8305265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MAG3 renogram deconvolution in kidney transplantation: utility of the measurement of initial tracer uptake. Bajén MT; Puchal R; González A; Grinyó JM; Castelao A; Mora J; Martin-Comin J J Nucl Med; 1997 Aug; 38(8):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9255171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of duplex Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate renal allograft dysfunction. Meyer M; Paushter D; Steinmuller DR Transplantation; 1990 Dec; 50(6):974-8. PubMed ID: 2256170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Serial resistive index and pulsatility index for diagnosing renal complications in the early posttransplant phase: improving diagnostic efficacy by considering maximum values. Radmehr A; Jandaghi AB; Hashemi Taheri AP; Shakiba M Exp Clin Transplant; 2008 Jun; 6(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 18816245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]