These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11959719)

  • 1. Methylcellulose as a rectal contrast agent for MR imaging of rectal carcinoma.
    Goh JS; Goh JP; Wansaicheong GK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 May; 178(5):1145-6. PubMed ID: 11959719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Can magnetic resonance imaging help to predict sphincter saving resection for low rectal cancers].
    Rouanet P; Lestra PM; Domergue J; Saint-Aubert B; Pradel J; Bruel JM; Joyeux H; Dubois JB; Solassol C; Pujol H
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1991; 15(4):364-5. PubMed ID: 2060750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rectal carcinoma: double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging.
    Wallengren NO; Holtås S; Andrén-Sandberg A; Jonsson E; Kristoffersson DT; McGill S
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 10751475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer.
    Fuchsjäger MH; Maier AG; Schima W; Zebedin E; Herbst F; Mittlböck M; Wrba F; Lechner GL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 12876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter: Screening for colonic and rectal carcinoma.
    Merlo RB
    JAMA; 1976 Mar; 235(9):906. PubMed ID: 946107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging.
    Vogl TJ; Pegios W; Mack MG; Hünerbein M; Hintze R; Adler A; Lobbeck H; Hammerstingl R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1427-34. PubMed ID: 9168702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advancing Dr Wong's vision for evaluating rectal cancer.
    Glasgow SC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Dec; 56(12):1325-6. PubMed ID: 24201383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The air contrast barium enema--indications and validity.
    Dodd GD
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 186():133-49. PubMed ID: 4034595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT of the bowel: use of water to enhance depiction.
    Angelelli G; Macarini L
    Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):848-9. PubMed ID: 3187013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasonography].
    Meir Y; Sela L; Antal SC; Abrahamson J; Kellner J
    Harefuah; 1991 May; 120(10):587-90. PubMed ID: 1937194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Rectal carcinoma--MRT is better than endorectal sonography].
    Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):928. PubMed ID: 15973612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Endorectal MRI and ultrasonography in rectal tumors: correlation with histological staging].
    Heindel W; Gossmann A; St Ernst ; Schäfer H; Kugel H; Krug B; Selzner M; Krahe T; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 9687949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double-contrast enema examination for detection of rectal carcinoma.
    Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):545-6. PubMed ID: 7054856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum by air contrast enema.
    Thorpe CD; Grayson DJ; Wingfield PB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Mar; 152(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 7466578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
    Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of MR imaging in treatment planning for patients with rectal carcinoma: have you checked the "DISTANCE"?
    Nougaret S; Reinhold C; Mikhael HW; Rouanet P; Bibeau F; Brown G
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):330-44. PubMed ID: 23882096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value and limits of endorectal ultrasonography for preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.
    Massari M; De Simone M; Cioffi U; Rosso L; Chiarelli M; Gabrielli F
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Dec; 8(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 9864111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance features of carcinoma of the tongue.
    Luccichenti G; Cademartiri F; Pizzigallo A; Cusmano F; Bastianello S
    Radiol Med; 2004 Oct; 108(4):394-403. PubMed ID: 15525893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations.
    Kaur H; Choi H; You YN; Rauch GM; Jensen CT; Hou P; Chang GJ; Skibber JM; Ernst RD
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(2):389-409. PubMed ID: 22411939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.