108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11960419)
1. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative MR mammography in suspect breast lesions].
Schneider A; Malur S; Hartmann M
Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):501; author reply 501-2. PubMed ID: 11960419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cost-effectiveness of MR-imaging in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions].
Schmitt KP; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):898-901. PubMed ID: 11588676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Studies weigh cost, effectiveness of mammography.
Cancer Discov; 2014 May; 4(5):OF5. PubMed ID: 24795028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast MR imaging. An analysis of its role with respect to other imaging and interventional modalities.
Brenner RJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):705-23. PubMed ID: 7489318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles.
Parikh J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):759-67. PubMed ID: 17411924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Palpable cancer of the breast and negative mammography: the ongoing dilemma.
Smith LF
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):451-2. PubMed ID: 17469111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI breast screening.
Dewey M; Martus P
Lancet; 2008 Apr; 371(9622):1415-6; author reply 1416. PubMed ID: 18440422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology.
McLelland R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jul; 143(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6428201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Focal and diffuse lesions in dynamic MR-mammography of healthy probands].
Kuhl CK; Seibert C; Sommer T; Kreft B; Gieseke J; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 7548868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-operative breast MRI in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer--where to next?
Houssami N; Morrow M
Breast; 2010 Feb; 19(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20159455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. CAD in screening mammography.
Gur D; Sumkin JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1474. PubMed ID: 17114539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonpalpable lesions in the augmented breast: preoperative localization.
Robertson CL; Kopans DB; McCarthy KA; Hart NE
Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):873-4. PubMed ID: 2813799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided mammography screening.
Hall FM
N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(8):836. PubMed ID: 19228631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
