These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11962019)

  • 1. [Mammographic screening should not be affected by unfounded arguments].
    Dean PB
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Feb; 99(9):944-5. PubMed ID: 11962019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mammographic screening is not evidence-based].
    Lindberg M
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jan; 99(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 11871200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Criticism of the Cochrane review on mammographic screening is not justified].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(5):653-4. PubMed ID: 11871223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for cancer: when is it valid?--Lessons from the mammography experience.
    Kopans DB; Monsees B; Feig SA
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 14595137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cochrane report on mammographic screening].
    Hessov I; Garne JP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Nov; 163(48):6767-8. PubMed ID: 11768907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Lancet supports Danish researchers against the breast cancer group. Mammographic screening causes a conflict within Cochrane].
    Ohlin E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Nov; 163(48):6769. PubMed ID: 11768908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Postoperative radiotherapy increases mortality in women with breast cancer diagnosed by mass screening].
    Gøtzsche PC; Olsen O
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jan; 98(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 11271572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [No evidence that mammographic screenings result in overtreatment].
    Garne JP; Hessov I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jul; 165(31):3025-6; author reply 3026-7. PubMed ID: 12938298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Vaidya JS; Baum M
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Aug; 349(6):610-2; author reply 610-2. PubMed ID: 12908462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Novel data on mammography: invitation to organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality].
    Schulz-Wendtland R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):52. PubMed ID: 11977394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.
    Kopans DB
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(2):580-1; author reply 581-3. PubMed ID: 11900247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.
    Ponzone R; Sismondi P; Baum M
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(2):579-80; author reply 581-3. PubMed ID: 11900246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(2):578; author reply 581-3. PubMed ID: 11900245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.
    Olsen O
    Cancer; 2002 Jan; 94(2):578-9; author reply 581-3. PubMed ID: 11900244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.
    Thurfjell EL; Lindgren JA
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8888234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [WHO and The Lancet: yes to mammographic screening].
    Garne JP; Hessov I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jun; 164(23):3081-2; discussion 3082-3. PubMed ID: 12082868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic screening: no reliable supporting evidence?
    Gøtzsche PC
    Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9307):706. PubMed ID: 11879887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
    Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?
    Trop I; Deck W
    Can Fam Physician; 2006 Sep; 52(9):1050-2. PubMed ID: 17279208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.