These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11963428)

  • 1. Hang on to your rights when faced with a sell-off.
    Buswell C
    Nurs Times; 2000 Jul; 96(30 Suppl):11-2. PubMed ID: 11963428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failing to chart can cost you your job! Case in point: Alexander v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources (484 So. 2d 722-LA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 May; 26(12):4. PubMed ID: 3636939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
    N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
    Pendergast J; Wagner B
    Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.
    Occup Health Saf; 1989 Mar; 58(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 2710464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
    Cornu-Quinn C
    Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The third age. Documentation for the RCI.
    Hurst C
    Aust Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 21(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 1958150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Constitutional complaint rejected].
    Pflege Z; 2016 Apr; 69(4):197. PubMed ID: 27218130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Think before you search.
    Northrop CE
    Nursing; 1987 Jul; 17(7):59. PubMed ID: 3648549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
    Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Erosion of employment-at-will doctrine continues. Deerman v. Beverly California Corp.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jul; 17(9):5-8. PubMed ID: 11067520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Baden-Württemberg curtails specialist quota. Requests for personnel will be revised].
    Pflege Z; 2016 Mar; 69(3):134. PubMed ID: 27182578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time for change?
    Bright L
    Nurs Older People; 2006 Aug; 18(7):7-9. PubMed ID: 16927542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A home guide.
    Ramaiah S; Payne S
    Nurs Times; 1987 Apr 29-May 5; 83(17):39-40. PubMed ID: 3647423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community care: caught in the crossfire.
    Nazarko L
    Nurs Stand; 1994 Jun 1-7; 8(36):55. PubMed ID: 8043382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divides and rules.
    Eaton L
    Nurs Times; 1993 Dec 15-21; 89(50):18. PubMed ID: 8278260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Where to from here for aged care?
    Mulrine L
    Nurs N Z; 2008 Oct; 14(10):33. PubMed ID: 19024594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New legal framework in residential care.
    George M
    Elder Care; 1997; 9(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 9180457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mergers and acquisitions--current antitrust law.
    Brennan KA
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1984 Sep; 10(5):66-9. PubMed ID: 10267958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.