353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11963939)
1. Reuser friendly: a review of the regulation of and the product liability regarding the reuse of single-use medical devices.
Wood JM; Heyman GF
Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 37(1):41-78. PubMed ID: 11963939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory and legal implications of reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices.
Wang EP
Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(1):77-98. PubMed ID: 11942352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Products liability implications of reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices.
Hogan JM; Colonna TE
Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(3):385-402. PubMed ID: 10346717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
Jarcho DG
Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
Neraas MB
Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reuse of single-use medical devices: informed consent and physician liability.
Colonna TE; Thomas DE
Tex Med; 1999 Mar; 95(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 10932637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reuse of disposable medical devices: regulatory and liability issues.
Kahan JS; Gibbs JN
Healthspan; 1985 Jul; 2(7):12-5. PubMed ID: 10272745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reuse of disposable equipment. Medicolegal viewpoint].
Fallani M; Milandri M
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1996 May; 44(5):263-73. PubMed ID: 8927256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. If it ain't broke, what are we trying to fix? Reprocessing devices labeled "for single use only".
Clough JD; Maurer W; Nickelson DE
Cleve Clin J Med; 2000 Sep; 67(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 10992626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal regulation of single-use medical devices: a revised FDA policy.
Smith JJ; Agraz JA
Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 11944641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Debate on reuse of "disposable" medical equipment fueled by FDA.
Gibson NK
J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Jan; 14(1):75. PubMed ID: 9641860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reusing single-use devices OK in some cases.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1997 Mar; 22(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 10165229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety.
Kesselheim AS
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 20485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FDA regulation on reprocessing single-use devices. The final word is in.
Health Devices; 2000 Oct; 29(10):371-3. PubMed ID: 11094777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Going 90 in a 55 M.P.H. speed zone: reprocessing of used single-use medical devices and the Food and Drug Administration's non-enforcement of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Karst KR
Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 11942351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New FDA regulation on reprocessing single-use devices. How it may affect U.S. hospitals.
Health Devices; 2000 May; 29(5):185-7. PubMed ID: 10851652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reuse of single-use medical devices.
Fielder JH
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(6):80-1. PubMed ID: 10576078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyeing the reprocessors. Makers of disposable devices push for controls on reuse.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):64. PubMed ID: 10170402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reuse of disposable medical products.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1996 Oct; 10(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10162038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
